AMAZING
GRACE (Ephesians):
(1) Destined In Love (1:1 - 6)
Page 3
(2) Riches of Grace (1:7 - 14)
Page 7
(3) Grace-Filled Praying (
Page 11
(4) Resurrected With Christ (2:1-10)
Page 14
(5) Christ Our Peace (
Page 18
(6) Stewards of Grace (3:1 - 13)
Page 22
(7) Praying That Reflects Our Richness in God (
Page 25
(8) One Lord. One Faith One Baptism;
Maintaining Unity Without Imposing Uniformity (4:1 - 6)
Page 29
(9) Body Life:
Maintaining Unity Without Imposing Uniformity
(4:7 - 16)
Page 32
(10) Learning and Living Christ
(
Page 36
(11) Sexual Purity
(5:3 - 21)
Page 40
(12) Wedded Bliss
(
Page 44
(13) Ties That Bind
(6:1 - 9)
Page 47
(14) Christian Warfare
(
Page 51
Notes
Page 55
AMAZING GRACE (Ephesians):
(1) Destined In Love (1:1 - 6)
This
is
Last
Easter Sunday one of our speakers was my cousin Mary Edgar - the children
may remember her with the parasol. She left our home the week after
Easter, returned to her family in
What
is it that gives us the courage to run the marathon of life, past the
Heartbreak Hill, to the finish? It's not the crowd cheering us, the sense
of achievement, the glory, the shame of not making it. It's the deep gut
feeling of being committed to something that is larger than ourselves.
It's the sense of knowing the truth, of being grounded in Reality, of
having confidence that we have staked our lives on something - or Someone
- Whom we can trust. It is the conviction that we have received something
that is true, no matter what difficulties we face on the way.
My
cousin Mary expressed it well: "the steady rock of God's covenant
love." And that is why Christians have often turned to the book of
Ephesians when they need a reminder of God's commitment to us. And at
the heart of that confidence is this staggering sentence - one of the
longest in Scripture, 202 words in the original - which speaks of that
hoary doctrine of predestination.
Now
don't be scared: I know that that's a taunt, a jest, something thrown in
the teeth of Presbyterians. But - rightly and Biblically understood (and
resist all attempts to caricature it) - the understanding that there is a
sovereign Lord at work in my life Whose purposes cannot be foiled except
by my will-fulness and sin is - as the Anglican or Episcopalian
seventeenth article of their Thirty-nine Articles of Faith states
it - "full of such sweet, pleasant, and unspeakable comfort to godly
persons, and such as feel in themselves the working of the Spirit of
Christ ... drawing up their mind to high and heavenly things, as well
because it greatly establishes and confirms their faith of eternal
Salvation to be enjoyed through Christ, as because it fervently kindles
their love towards God."[i]
This
sentence at the beginning of Ephesians can be broken into two sections:
verses 3 through 7, our faith as seen from God's view (a
"heavenly" perspective) and verses 8 through 14 (an
"earthly" view).
I THE AUTHOR OF OUR SALVATION - the triune God
"Blessed
be the God and Father of our Lord Jesus Christ." The traditional
blessing of the Old Testament and of Hebrews sabbath by sabbath in their
worship is now used to extol the Messiah. And - to complete the
trinitarian analogy - it is a Spiritual blessing.
God
is the author of our salvation. It is His word that tells me that I am a
member of the new covenant people, chosen as Israel was as God's old
covenant people. I am "elect", "chosen" by God. This
is not my word - I could not have imagined anything so utterly
inconceivable: it is God's description, a desire of His that I be called
and am called - as is stated in verse 1 - to be a "saint". Less
likely material could hardly be imagined. So the knowledge that I am
"elect", or "chosen" by God is no grounds for
presumption or pride, it is a cause of the profoundest humility. Beyond
comprehension: that God "in the heavenly place" could have
determined that I should be His child is beyond my comprehension. I
embrace the truth finally because God has revealed it. And I find in it
the most humbling reality - that there was nothing I could do to influence
that choice. Indeed, quite the opposite. Only God was powerful enough to
save me from my sin.
II THE NATURE OF OUR SALVATION - electing love
"We
were chosen ... before the
foundation of the world." Wait, you say to me. "I chose God. I
made up my mind to follow Him." "Yes", I reply, "you
did. But only because God chose you first." And someone else
may pipe up: "I decided to follow Jesus."
"But", I reply, "only because Jesus in eternity first
decided to follow you."[ii]
Election
and the sovereign will of God is not blind, capricious, malevolent,
hate-full. It does not turn us into automata, but rather it releases us to
be ourselves. Why? Because it is premised on love: "He chose us ..
before the foundation of the world ... in love He destined
us". As we used to sing in that wonderful old hymn in the 1955 Hymnbook:
"I
sought the Lord and afterward I knew
He
moved my soul to seek Him, seeking me;
It
was not I that found O Saviour true;
No,
I was found of Thee.
I
find, I walk, I love, but O the whole
Of
love is but my answer, Lord, to Thee!
For
Thou wert long beforehand with my soul;
Always
Thou lovest me."[iii]
III THE PURPOSE OF OUR SALVATION - holiness
Does
this then mean that we can coast through to the end, considering ourselves
to be - dreadful word - "eternally secure"? Is it immaterial how
I live, now that I'm "in"?
Paul
says emphatically "No". God chose us for one purpose only:
"to be holy and blameless before Him". Holiness is the only
evidence that I have that I am chosen as God's child. If anyone claims to
be among "the elect" but lives in sin he is - as John states
emphatically "a liar". The prominent New Testament scholar F. F.
Bruce said: "The predestinating love of God is commended more by
those who lead holy and Christlike lives than by those whose attempts to
unravel the mystery partake of the nature of logic-chopping."[iv]
IV THE CONSEQUENCE OF OUR SALVATION - adoption
"He
destined us to be adopted as His sons and daughters." That is why God
chose us - to be a part of His family, children by nature and adoption.
Why did God go ahead with creation when He must have known we would fall?
God had a higher destiny for us than simply being His
created children. He wanted us to enter into the intimacy of being
an adopted child.
But
intimacy does not absolve us of responsibility. As those who have now
taken His name we are called, as His children, to behave as those who
imitate our heavenly Parent "as beloved children"[v]
V THE EFFECT OF OUR SALVATION - praise
And
why did God chose us? The answer is to be found in verse 7 - "unto
the praise of the glory of his grace which he has freely given us in the
beloved". What God has done for us "in Christ" - that's a
key word that repeats itself in verses 3, 4, 6, 7, 9, twice in 10, 11, 12
and twice in 13 - should move us to the most profound experience of praise
and worship.
It
was A. W. Tozer who complained, a generation ago, that "The church
has substituted her once lofty concept of God and has substituted for it
one so low, so ignoble, as to be utterly unworthy of thinking, worshipping
man. The low view of God entertained almost universally among Christians
is the cause of a hundred lesser evils everywhere among us." Our
praise is lacking depth because we forget from where we have come, it
lacks height because it cannot soar to a God whose purposes it ignores,
and it lacks connectedness because it fails to see the wonder of a
called-out community where sisters and brothers have experienced a
common mercy which is not based on performance or perfection.
On
the 1st of May, 1558, John Calvin mounted the steps of Eglise St. Pierre
in Geneva to preach a series of forty-eight sermons on the book of
Ephesians. The previous year he had gone through the tragedy of Servetus.
His health was in serious decline. Throughout the congregation that Sunday
morning there were refugees whose presence reminded him of the defeats and
triumphs of Reformed believers all over Europe. His domestic situation was
a shambles[vi].
But he stood up that day and simply stated:
"...
the reason why St. Paul sets down the word 'blessings' is to cause us to
know that whereas the devil lays many traps to ... turn us out of the way,
God has made provision for all that, for he has such a store of blessing
that he can overthrow and destroy all that may ever be against our
salvation ... Let us fall down before the majesty of our God .. praying
him to acquaint us more and more with them ... and seek to find in our
Lord Jesus Christ all that we need, and not for one day, or for a mere
brief moment, but continually and steadfastly to our life's end. And
whatever happens to us, let us always assure ourselves that we have good
cause to praise our God."[vii]
Praise
be to the God and Father of our Lord Jesus Christ, who has blessed us in
the heavenly realms with every spiritual blessing in Christ for he chose
us in him before the creation of the world to be holy and blameless in his
sight.
AMAZING GRACE (EPHESIANS):
(2) Riches of Grace (1:7 - 14)
Perhaps
on this Sunday, as our eyes may be turned toward Washington, it would not
be inappropriate for me to reflect for just a moment, as a preamble to our
discussion on Ephesians 1:7 to 14, on the American obsession with
individualism and rights. "Individualism", one observer notes,
"has come to define American culture."[viii]
Alasdair MacIntyre of Notre Dame points out that rights language has come
to replace virtue language[ix].
Friendship becomes an opportunity to pursue personal goals. Marriage is
regarded a relationship that furthers my growth, my rights, rather than
an opportunity for service and mutuality.
But
there is a terrible price that we pay for this. The observer I quoted
concludes that "the major single problem for American social life is
the problem of relationships - we do not understand them and cannot
maintain them"[x]. We are
supposed to be strong, tough, self-sufficient but we struggle with how to
deal with those around us. He reflects sadly on "Our failing
marriages, our profound loneliness, and our desperate search for
ourselves"[xi]. All three
are evidence that in some way we have lost the Way. Rights have replaced
relationships - with God and with my fellow creatures made in God's image.
The
profound truth of Ephesians 1:3-14 is that our Creator made us for one
purpose only: that we might enter into a relationship, first with God
and then with each other. And this reflects the relationship between
Father, Son and Holy Spirit. The 202 words in this single sentence are
unabashedly trinitarian. We have seen in verses 3 through 6 the Father
Who calls us into a relationship with Him. We go on now in the remaining
verses to discover a Son Who redeems us and a Spirit Who seals us. The
interconnectedness between Father, Son and Holy Spirit reflects the
reality that we are called into a community of love and responsibility.
I THE SON WHO REDEEMS US (verses 7 - 10)
The
key concept of verses 7 through 10 is "redemption". And it is
the son Who is specifically mentioned here as our Redeemer,
"in Him we have redemption through his blood".
"Redemption"
is on of those Biblical words that is an essential part of the vocabulary
of anyone who wants to understand the Christian faith. But it is not a
word that is very intelligible today. Twenty years ago a group of students
from Trinity Evangelical Divinity School in suburban Chicago went out and
asked randomly in a shopping center what certain words at the heart of
Christianity meant to the woman or man on the street.
"Redemption", in those days of giving out coupon books, meant
only one thing - S and H green stamps.
Seventy-seven
years ago Benjamin Warfield, one of our great Presbyterian teachers of
systematic theology, spoke to incoming students at Princeton Seminary and
urged them to retain that word which even then was going out of fashion.
He stated: "There is no one of the titles of Christ which is more
precious to Christian hearts than 'Redeemer.'"[xii]
And as evidence of that he went to the hymnbook, citing -
among many others - the hymn we have just sung:
"O
for a thousand tongues to sing
My
dear Redeemer's praise."
What
does "redemption" mean in its New Testament context? Simply this
- to quote one commentator[xiii]
- "deliverance as a result of the payment of a ransom".
"Now" - you say to me - "salvation is free." You
find distasteful the idea that God would have to pay for my
forgiveness - it demeans God as being a cheapskate. But the word
redemption is rich in its Biblical imagery: it goes back to a cultural
tradition, found in the Old Testament, when slaves could be bought back
from bondage. We have many chits with the standard language:
"Date.
'N. N. sold to the Pithian Apollo a male slave anmes X. Y. at a price of
.... minae for freedom (or on condition that he shall be free)." Then
the witnesses' names follow."[xiv]
Now
Jesus Christ comes and says[xv]: "The
Son of Man did not come to be
served, but to serve, and to give his life as a ransom for many."
And the early church affirmed the same: Titus 2:14 tells us that
Jesus "gave himself for us to redeem us from all wickedness". Or
I Peter 1:18: "it was not with perishable things such as silver or
gold that you were redeemed ... but with the precious blood of Christ, a
lamb without blemish or defect".
The
imagery is simple: Christ bought us back from the slavery of sin, redeeming
us by the payment of His life, freeing us into "the forgiveness of
sins". The freedom for which we have been redeemed is a freedom that
comes from knowing that Christ has wiped the slate clean. "In Jesus
Christ we are forgiven". And this forgiveness is "lavished"
upon us by the riches of the grace of which he has been continually
speaking.
And
what is the purpose of God in so redeeming us? Look at the second part of
verse 10: "... to bring all things together under one head, even
Christ". Six words "to bring together under one head" in
English translate a single Greek verb of seventeen letters. And, as
Martin Lloyd-Jones points out,
it does not even include an important prefix in that word. "To bring
together again under one head" might be more accurate.
We
believe that everything was under a single Head before the Fall. And that
headship has been, is being, and will be, restored in Christ's redemption.
It is that reality that sustains us amid all the contradictions of our
life here below. We see a world disjointed, uncoordinated, full of
dissonance and disorder. We ask God - sometimes as we shake our fist at
the deity - "Why?" And then we read these words: "when the
times .. have reached their fulfillment (He will) bring all things in
heaven and on earth together again under one head, even
Christ".
"The
perfect harmony that will be restored will be harmony in man and between
men. Harmony on the earth and in the brute creation! Harmony in heaven,
and all under this blessed Lord Jesus Christ who will be head of all! ...
That is the message; that is God's plan ... These things are so marvelous
that you will never hear anything greater, either in this world or the
world to come."[xvi]
II THE SPIRIT WHO SEALS US (verses 11 - 14)
But
in the mean time, you say to me. "It is hard to believe, hard to
receive, hard to accept, hard to lives as a Christian - particularly when
I think that it is - to journey's end."
Ephesians
gives us a single answer: the Spirit of God is the one that
"applies" our salvation to us. And it uses a single concept:
that of a "seal". We are sealed by the Spirit of promise:
"You were marked .. with a seal, the promised Holy Spirit, who is a
deposit guaranteeing our inheritance" (verse 14).
A
seal - according to Charles Hodge -
does several things for us. It confirms the genuineness of a document or
possession. It establishes ownership. It makes something secure. The
Spirit of God does all three: it affirms that we are indeed God's
children, it marks us as God's special property. And it secures us until
that day, "guaranteeing our inheritance".
And
the Spirit Who seals us does four things for us:
(1) "Effectually calls" -
verse 11 is different from verse 4 - the chosen-ness of the believer means
in this context that God will work His purpose out in our lives as the
Holy Spirit works within us "in conformity with the purpose of His
will".
(2) Glorifies Jesus -
"for the praise of his glory" is repeated twice - verses 12 and
14. That is the Spirit's task - to draw attention not to Himself but to
Jesus. And He does this practically by producing Jesus-like qualities in
our lives " "we" are for the praise of the glory of
Jesus.
(3) Makes one new people -
"we who were the first to hope in Christ" (verse 12) are now
joined to Gentiles who "were included in Christ when you heard the
word of truth". The Holy Spirit establishes a new community, breaking
down barriers, a single body, establishing peace, restoring relationships.[xvii]
(4) Helps us understand the Bible -
the Holy Spirit speaks through "the word of truth" and can never
be separated from it. For when people like David Koresh of Waco, Texas,
say that they have truth aside from Scripture or interpret Scripture
according to their whims (or self-interest) what they say must always be
interpreted through the Bible as the Holy Spirit illumines the sacred
page.
One
of the great Presbyterians of our century is John Alexander MacKay who was
from 1936 to 1959 the President of what was then the largest Presbyterian
seminary in the world, Princeton. In some profoundly moving words he
stated categorically: "Apart from
... the vision that met me in the Epistle to the Ephesians, I am
nothing, and my life has no meaning."[xviii] And then
he explained his amazing claim.
On
holiday in the summer of 1903, in the Highlands of Scotland, he met Jesus
Christ in a service during what Highlanders call the communion season, in
a service conducted in a glen as hundred were seated in rows under the
shade of some large trees. He
went out and purchased, for a coin which was called a "bun
penny" (a picture of Queen Victoria with a bun at the back of her
head) and started to read. He was arrested by this very book we are
studying. And he concluded:
"My
personal interest in God's Order began when the only way in which life
could make sense to me was upon the basis of an inner certainty that I
myself, through the operation of a power which the Ephesian letter taught
me to call 'grace,' had become part of that Order, and that I must hence
forth devote my energies to its unfolding and fulfillment."[xix]
Grace.
Amazing grace. Grace that calls us into God's new order: life in
relationship, relationship to a Trinity: a Father who chooses us, a Son
Who redeems us, a Spirit who seals us.
"The
Lord has promised good to me,
His
word my hope secures,
He
will my shield and portion be
As
long as life endures."[xx]
In
him we have redemption ... the
forgiveness of sins, in accordance with the riches of God's grace which he
lavished on us ... marked in him with a seal, the promised Holy Spirit ..
a deposit guaranteeing our inheritance ... to the praise of his glory.
AMAZING GRACE (Ephesians):
(3) Grace-Filled Praying (1:15-23)
You
are familiar with the pollster who asked a passer-by: "Is it true
that the two biggest problems facing the United States today are ignorance
and apathy?"
"I
don't know and I don't care", came back the response.
Several
weeks ago pollster George Gallup, Jr., in an article titled
"Empowering The Laity" declared that the biggest problems facing
American Christians are ignorance and "an undeveloped prayer
life". I quote:
"An
undeveloped prayer life, coupled with ignorance of Scripture appears to
have caused us to turn away from the living God and choose the substitute
gods of the modern age -- money, possessions, fame, drugs, and a
self-indulgent lifestyle. We say we believe in God, but it would appear
that at the same time we reject a supernatural basis for life ... There is
a break in our vertical relationship with a higher power, or God, and
consequently a break in our horizontal relationship with other people."[xxi]
His
prescription?
"Of
the primary spiritual needs of the American people, surely one is the need
for practical help in developing a mature faith. Americans pray and
believe in the power of prayer, but we do not give our prayer life the
attention it deserves ... A culture with an emphasis on instant
gratification and characterized by a noisy roar and constant bustle does
not make meditative prayer easy. Its penchant for fast foods and quick
credit does not produce people who are adept at waiting patiently for
God's presence to touch them."[xxii]
And so his conclusion is a simple one:
"Deepened
prayer life, coupled with rootedness in Scripture, can lead us to new
dimensions of faith, and at the same time, a new openness and acceptance
of others."[xxiii]
At
the end of Ephesians chapter 1, Paul's concern for First Century
Christians to whom he writes is remarkably similar to that of George
Gallup as American Christians face the Twenty-first. He prays - and in his
praying models true prayer, for lessons in prayer are better caught than
taught. And his prayer? He wants believers to have more knowledge about
their faith in order that they might be truly empowered to live for God.
I KNOWLEDGE (verses 15 - 18)
"For
this reason": Paul begins his prayer in verse 15 holding before them
all the truths that he has taught in that cascading sentence that is
verses 3 through 14. He continues: "I thank God and I never give up
praying for you."[xxiv] And what is
it for which he prays? The kernel of his prayer is to be found at the end
of verse 17: "that you may know Him better".
To
know God. What does Paul mean? Paul would be the first to say that knowing
God is not knowing about God. You can know a great deal about the
Bible, even about God Himself, even discover these great truths of which
he has spoken in the first 14 verses, and still not know God.
Knowing
God, according to James Packer who wrote a book with that title, consists
of three things: one, personal dealing - dealing with God as
He opens up to you and being dealt by Him as He takes knowledge of you; two,
personal involvement in mind, will and feeling; third, grace,
because the initiative in that relationship is always God's. And then
Packer concludes that what matters is not so much that I know God by
"that He knows me".[xxv]
But
it is also a knowledge of God's salvation. Look at verse 18 to see the
dimensions of what God has done for us:
hope - "the hope to which He has called
you" or, as Phillips has it, "a hope like that". Like what?
Like everything he has said earlier: being "holy and blameless in his
sight" (verse 4), the adoption to which he refers in verse 5, and
that we are called "to the praise of his glory" (verse 12) Or as
John says in his letter[xxvi] "Here
and now we are God's children. We don't know what we shall become in the
future. We only know that, if reality were to break through, we should
reflect His likeness, for we should see Him as He is." Hope is our
assurance.
inheritance - "the riches of his glorious inheritance
in the saints". What is the legacy God has given to us as His adopted
children? Thomas Goodwin answers that "An inheritance you know is a
thing for a man to use freely and to one's top the uttermost for his
comfort; you shall have God and all his attributes set before you. Lo,
there is your inheritance."
power - "the resources of His power open to us
who trust in Him"[xxvii]
And then he goes into the second part of His prayer for them - that they
will experience the empowering of the divine presence.
II POWER (verses 19 - 23)
So
Paul prays that those to whom he writes will be empowered - "That
power is the working of his mighty strength". Armitage Robinson,
pointed out the three emphatics - the working, the might, the strength and
adds "we have no words that fully represent the original of this
phrase"[xxviii].
Only examples will do:
(1) resurrection power
- the power which He prays these Christians will experience is that of the
Easter Lord, which broke the bands of death and the power of evil. And
that is ours as well.
(2) heavenly power
- the power of the ascended Lord which placed Him "in heavenly
realms, far above all rule and authority, power and dominion, not only in
this present age but also in the one to come" (verses 20c and 21)
(3) power experienced in the church -
this power now fills - or should fill - the church[xxix].
Doctors at this time thought that the head controlled the body so now the
Head fills the body with powers of movement and perception, and thereby
inspires the whole body with life and direction"[xxx]
"La
connaisance est force" - "Knowledge is power" - was the
motto of my children's Toronto French School. Every day they were taught
that knowledge was empowering, ignorance was limiting, inhibiting,
weakening. We know that in Boston, the intellectual Hub of our country, a
city that prides itself on endless years of graduate education, where we
all must update our skills in school, always learning. But what of the
Christian? Are we thinking, stretching our faith, challenging our
presuppositions, always probing, exploring, stretching our faith. Do we
listen? Do we read? Do we make use of the Library? Do we discipline ourselves
in Bible study?
To
quote George Gallup again:
"The
years ahead could be an important time of renewal and deepened religious
commitment among Americans if the faith communities of our nation help
people bring the Bible into their daily lives; listen to the remarkable
religious experiences of people, and help them build upon these
experiences; encourage small group fellowship, which serves as a way to
support current members; inspire people to reach out to others in
evangelism, but in appropriate and loving ways; target key groups for
spiritual nourishment and religious instruction - people in business and
professions, students, the media, and other groups."[xxxi]
Knowledge
and power: the two missing ingredients of the modern church. If we knew,
we would be empowered. What greater request can we make of the Lord
for Newton Presbyterian Church?
I
keep asking that the God of our Lord Jesus Christ, the glorious Father,
may give you the Spirit ... so that you may know Him better ... that you
may know ... his incomparably great power for us who believe.
AMAZING GRACE (Ephesians):
(4) Resurrected With Christ (2:1-10)
In
two of my ministries in Canada I worked with two remarkable sisters, one
of them the wife of the Clerk of Session in Knox Church, Toronto, the
other a board member for InterVarsity Christian Fellowship. They bore a
famous name: Ironside. Their uncle, Harry Ironside, was first an itinerant
Brethren evangelist and then the minister of Moody Church, Chicago. On my
visit to their home, these sisters would tell many stories about their
uncle, for stories about Harry were legion.
The
one I like the most is when Harry Ironside was traveling from his home in
Oakland to a speaking engagement in Southern California and a gypsy lady
came up to him. "How do you do, gentleman", she asked.
"Would you like to have your fortune told? Cross my palm with a
silver quarter, and I will give you your past, present, and future."
"Are
you sure you can do that?" Ironside asked. "I am Scottish and I
wouldn't want to part with money without getting full value." The
woman became persistent: "Oh yes, gentleman, Please. I will tell you
all."
At
that point Harry Ironside brought out his New Testament from his pocket.
"It's not really necessary for me to have you tell my fortune,
because here I have a book that gives me my past, present and
future." And he turned to the second chapter of Ephesians and read:
"As for you, you were dead in your .. sins." "That's my
past", Ironside said, concluding verses 1 through 3.
"That's
enough", the woman said, trying to get away. "I don't care to
hear more."
"But
wait", Ironside continued. "There is more. Here is my present:
"God who is rich in mercy made us alive with Christ." And he
read on from verse 4. "No more!" she protested. "Here is my
future, too," Ironside said refusing to let her go and reading on in
verse 7: "that in the coming ages he might show ... the riches of his
grace". And by that time the gypsy fled muttering: "I took the
wrong man!"[xxxii]
Last
week a request came to the Worship Committee as it met: "Give us the
gospel in a few simple sentences. Give us a chance to respond!" If
you want to know what Christianity is all about, if you ask me what it
means to be a Christian, there is no passage in the whole of the Bible
more basic than Ephesians 2:1 to 10. It distills the first five chapters
of Romans into a single paragraph. With its opening two words - "As
for you" - it takes us from salvation from God's point of view in
chapter 1 to the perspective of the individual Christian. It tells us two
things: what we are without God and what we can become with God. It is, as
one great New Testament scholar called it, "one of the great passages
of all Scripture".[xxxiii]
I. THE HUMAN PREDICAMENT (verses 1 - 3)
And
there are three words to describe that predicament:
(1) dead (verses 1 - 2)
- Listen to the apostle: "You were dead in your transgressions and
sins." Those are not my words and that diagnosis may seem a little
drastic. Some tell us with Dr. Thomas Harris and his transactional
analysis "I'm OK, You're OK." Things are getting better
generally. Others say that the patient is sick, but needs minor surgery.
The statement here is sweeping: without a relationship with God you are
dead, dead in our trespasses and sins. "Trespass" is a false
step, crossing a boundary, getting off the path. "Sin" is a
missing of the mark, falling short of a standard. Trespass is active, sin
passive: before God we are rebels and failures[xxxiv].
But there is more:
(2) enslaved (verse 2)
- "you followed the ways of this world and of the ruler of the
kingdom of the air, the spirit who is now at work in those who are
disobedient", captive to the world, the flesh and the devil. The
world: "drift(ing) along the stream of this
world's ideas of living". The devil: "following the ...
ruler of the kingdom of the air (which is) the spirit of disobedience".
The flesh: "our sinful nature" as the NIV translates it - our
ingrained self-centeredness. All these have entrapped us.
(3) condemned (verse 3)
"we were by nature objects of wrath". As John Stott states:
"I doubt if there is an expression in Ephesians which has provoked
more hostility than this."[xxxv] But God's
wrath is not His bad temper: It is, as John Stott defines it, "God's
personal, righteous, constant hostility to evil, his settled refusal to
compromise with it, and his resolve instead to condemn it."[xxxvi]
Now
these are terrible words. The diagnosis is total, complete and
catastrophic. It does not mince words, play around with the enormity of
our distance from our God: it confronts the human condition. With Pogo we
can say: "We have seen the enemy and it is us."
II. THE DIVINE INITIATIVE (verses 4 - 10)
"But
God": these words suddenly lighten up the darkness, irradiate the
grace of which Paul will now speak. The more we are aware of the extent of
our predicament the more these words come on us with relief as we wonder
at the divine love and Gift. As Martyn Lloyd Jones stated: "These two
words, in and of themselves, in a sense contain the whole of the
gospel."
"But
God": we sing glibly about amazing grace. But you really cannot sing
of grace until you have recognized your guilt. Grace is amazing only
because it is so undeserved, so unexpected, so utterly surprising.
"But God": until those two words overwhelm you you will never
know the good news. The gospel is simply this: "But God".
(1) what God did (verses 4 - 7)
And here language fails Paul. He invents three words, adding the prefix
"syn" with each. God made us alive together with Christ (verse
5), he raised us up together with Christ (verse 6a) and He made us sit
together with Christ in the heavenly places (verse 6b). In other words, we
are united with Christ in His Resurrection, His Ascension, and His
Session. When we say "The third day He rose again from the dead, He
ascended into heaven, He sits on the right hand of God" we are saying
that He raised me as well, He made me ascend into heaven, and made me sit
with Christ in heaven. As Jim Boice states: "Taken together, these
words make one of the most significant statements in the Bible of what has
happened to Christians as a result of their union with Christ."[xxxvii]
(2) why God did it (verses 8 - 9)
Now why did God do this? Simply as in verse 7 - "to show the
inexhaustible riches of his grace." And then we come to verses 8 and
9, after John 3:16 probably the most familiar
and most loved verses in the whole of the Bible. "For by grace you
have been saved, through faith - and this not from yourselves, it is the
gift of God - not by works, so that no one can boast."
My favorite illustration of those verses is from
Donald Gray Barnhouse who repeated a story from one of the worst slums of
London a hundred years ago. There a social worker named Henry Moorhouse
saw a little girl coming out of a basement carrying a pitcher of milk.
Suddenly she slipped and fell, the milk ran into the gutter and the
pitcher broke into several pieces on the sidewalk. The girl was
distraught. "My mommy will whip me, my mommy will whip me," she
kept crying.
Moorhouse reassured the girl, taking the pieces
of the broken pitcher and trying to piece them together. The girl became
hopeful. Many objects in her home had been mended and put together. But
just as they came back he knocked them part. More tears. Another time he
put them together, the girl brightened, but this time he was without a
handle for the pitcher. As she attached it, the pieces came apart again.
The girl was hysterical as she looked at the broken pieces on the
sidewalk.
Then he took her up in his arms, carried her to a
store that sold crockery, and bought a new pitcher. Then he went to the
spot the girl had bought the milk in the first place. He asked her where
she lived, carried her to the house, set her on the steps, and put the
pitcher in her hands. "Now", he asked, "will your mother
whip you?" And she replied: "Oh no sir, because it's a lot
better pitcher than we had before."
That is the way God's grace operates. We were
made in God's image, but that image was smashed beyond repair by the sin
of our first parents. We tried to repair it, but to no avail. We attempt
to put the pieces back of our broken righteousness but we cannot do it.
Bits and pieces are all we have left. But then grace intervenes: Jesus
did not try to repair our brokenness. And His grace means - to paraphrase
the little girl - that we have
a lot better nature than we ever had before."[xxxviii]
Yes,
you say to me, but how does God's exchange gift of wholeness for my
brokenness become mine? The verse tells us: "through faith".
Faith is simply "the empty hands by which I accept God's gift".
It is not based on how I feel, it is not believing in spite of all the
evidence to the contrary, it is the simple reaching out and receiving a
gift. It means that I accept and receive what someone Else has done that I
could not do. It means coming home and hearing the Father say: "This
my child was dead and is now alive."
(3) what God expects of us (verse 10)
And then what? "We are God's workmanship, created in Christ Jesus to
do good works." "Not of works" but "created in
Christ Jesus to do good works". God's - literally -
"masterpiece". Accepting a gift does not mean we have no
responsibility. Indeed grace enhances our accountability: a loving
response to a God Who wants us to be his "masterpiece".
And
what does this have to do with Mother's Day, you ask me? You haven't even
mentioned mothers or families or children! Let me tell you, in conclusion,
about a service on November 11, 1956, in Westminster Chapel, the leading
congregational church in England which at that time had the largest
attendance of any congregation in London. The minister, Martyn
Lloyd-Jones, was going through Ephesians and had spent the previous year
in the first chapter, going through it verse by verse.
Remembrance
Sunday that year, 1956, found London in convulsion: the previous Tuesday
the Security Council of the United Nations, led by America and Russia, had
censured France, Britain and Israel for their invasion of Egypt at Suez.
Historians would later date the end of the British Empire, on which the
sun had never set for a hundred years, to that month of November, 1956.
Lloyd-Jones
was under tremendous pressure to preach something patriotic, seizing on
the passions of the hour. Instead he kept on in Ephesians 2, speaking that
morning on two words from verse 4: "But God". He stated
unapologetically: "The many who do not think in a Christian and
biblical manner believe that the business of the Christian Church on a day
such as this is to ... say what we think the statesmen should do ... The
Biblical method, rather is to display God's truth and then to show the
relevance of that to any given situation ... The Bible ... invites us at
the very beginning to lift up our eyes and to look at God."[xxxix]
If
there was ever an issue when we need to look at God first it is the
families of our nation. You do not need to adopt a so-called "family
values" platform to recognize the crisis in our homes today. Domestic
violence is on the rise and the assumptions that many of us thank God our
mothers and fathers used when they raised us are no longer there. We need
to have the great "But God" of the beginning of verse 4 written
over our homes today.
And
we need to give ourselves again to the God Who calls us out of the
darkness of our own human predicament into the glory of His light and
truth. The initiative was His, the grace is His: may the faith be ours
today.
For
by grace you have been saved, through faith - and this not from
yourselves, it is the gift of God - not by works, so that no one can
boast.
AMAZING GRACE (Ephesians):
(5) Christ Our Peace (2:11 - 22)
A
month tomorrow I will be flying to Istanbul, one of my favorite cities.
There I will be taking a group of Americans to the Archaeological Museum
where you can see a white limestone slab which to me expresses the
difference that Jesus' coming made to a divided world. We could call it
"Exhibit A" of Before Christ. It was found in the temple
precincts in Jerusalem, then part of the Ottoman Empire, in 1871 and
brought to Constantinople as the capital. It says simply:
"No
foreigner may enter within the barrier and enclosure round the temple.
Anyone who is caught doing so will have himself to blame for his ensuing
death."
Josephus
in his Antiquities tells us about that stone wall and the
inscription: "a partition made of stone all round, whose height was
three cubits. Its construction was very elegant; upon it stood pillars at
equal distance from one another, declaring the law of purity, some in
Greek and some in Roman letters, that 'no foreigner should go within that
sanctuary'."[xl]
"(Jesus)
... has broken down the dividing wall of hostility." So Paul states
the effect of the coming of Christ. He explains it in verse 16: "That
he ... might reconcile us both to God in one body through the cross,
thereby bringing the hostility to an end."
The
effect of the collapse of Marxist ideology is to tribalize the world:
the word "balkanize" has a new significance given the events we
see every day on television from Bosnia. Christianity, now that
Communism is no more, is the one trans-national ideology that calls for
the allegiance of humankind and transcends - or should transcend - any
ethnic or cultural or racial identity. "Should" - one confesses
with sorrow that some of our worse tribal conflict is in the name of
religion: Bosnian Muslims vs Bosnian Serbs or Croats, Northern Irish
Catholics vs Northern Irish Protestants. There is no greater travesty of
the gospel than the establishment of exclusion zones in the name of Jesus.
The
remaining verses of Ephesians 2, 11 through 22, are addressed to Gentiles
by the Jew Paul. He speaks of what we were (verses 11 - 12), what Jesus
has done (verses 13 - 18) and what we have become (verses 19 - 22). I know
of no better focus on this Sunday when we are thinking about the future of
our congregation than to focus on the unity Christ brings to this family
of faith in a racially polarized city like Boston, that in spite of its
intellectual sophistication, its political correctness, its financial
wizardry still has failed to bring women and men together in a true
common-wealth.
I WHAT WE WERE: an alienated humanity (verses
11 and 12)
In
these two verses Paul addresses himself to Gentiles. He mouths that old
taunt: "uncircumcised" and reminds his readers of the disdain
that Jews felt for them. Labels: they hurt. We can think of them without
mouthing them. Some of us know bitterly that epithet thrown at the early
Nova Scotians when they came to Boston: "Herring choker". Others
know the taunt of the school yard: "Fatty". Growing up in the
'50's and being the last to be chosen for the baseball
team I can recall "Co-ordo". Calvin
Trillium's recent Remembering Denny speaks about white shoe
versus black shoe at Yale at the same time and the stigma of being a
"weenie".[xli]
And the equivalent of the cry "uncircumcised" in the First
Century would be the chilling word thrown at those of Paul's race ever
since Christianity gained the ascendency: "Christ-killer".
Christians have to take their share of blame for labelling, for the
Holocaust. "Christ-killer": no epithet has done more to damage
our faith's credibility.
Five
things that we note characterized this alienated humanity, we Gentiles: we
were "separated from the Messiah" - we had no anticipation of
deliverance, nothing to look forward to. Further - two - we were
alienated from the commonwealth of Israel and - three - strangers
to the covenants of Israel. And then, even more damning - four -
having no hope and five "without God in the world".
These
are the things we are to "remember" - the word is found in
verses 11 and 12. It is only when we recall what we were that we can
respond in true gratitude to
II WHAT JESUS HAS DONE: a peacemaking Christ (verses
13 - 18)
"But
now", verse 13, is equivalent to the "But God" of
verse 4. "But now in Christ Jesus you who were far off
have been brought near. Now "in Christ Jesus" - bringing back
the truth of the first chapter and those three manufactured verbs of
verses 5 and 6 of the present chapter - and "by the blood of
Christ" (as in 1:7).
"For
He is our peace", making us - Jew and Gentile - one. He broke
down the dividing wall. He brought all nations and people together. And
how? Three things:
One:
"he abolished in His flesh the law" (verse 15a). What does that
mean? Are we able to ignore the law because of what Christ did? Are we not
under grace? Are we to sin because - as Voltaire said of God - "c'est
son metier". It's God's business to forgive.
No:
Paul is speaking of ceremonial law. The New English Bible speaks of
"its rule and regulations". But Christ has also done away with
the law as a way of ever pleasing God.
Two:
Jesus made "one new man out of two" (verse 15b). We are reminded
of Galatians 3:28: "There is neither Jew nor Greek, there is neither
slave nor free, there is neither male nor female; for you are all one in
Christ Jesus." We need to eradicate all racism, all unconscious or
subconscious feelings that our culture, our traditions, our skin
pigmentation, our language, is "best". Christ has made us one.
Three:
Christ has reconciled us (verse 16) through His body into a single body.
That word "reconciliation" is often abused, cheapened. Martyn
Lloyd-Jones suggests some of its five-fold richness[xlii]:
changing from 'hostile" to 'friendly', re-connecting, a completed and
thorough action, something that comes down from above ('kata' in the
Greek) - not two sides coming together. And finally restoration, bringing
back something that was there before.
So
Christ (verse 17) "preached peace". "First" - to quote
John Stott[xliii] - "he
achieved it, then he announced it." The risen Lord's first words were
"Peace be with you."[xliv]And
he spoke to those "afar" and those "near". And it is
through Him (verse 18) that we share a common access to the Father by the
one Spirit.
III WHAT WE HAVE NOW BECOME: God's new society (verses
19 - 22)
And
here Paul paints three word-pictures of the new society - the
international, inter-racial, and inter-necine bonding that has taken
place:
One:
we
are (verse 19a) God's kingdom. We were stateless citizens (verses
12) but now we are no longer "resident aliens" even but we carry
a proud passport, and we are "fellow citizens" with all the
saints.
Two:
we are (verse 19b) God's family, "members of God's
household". We "brethren", brothers and sisters, the
church is a Philadelphia, a city of sisterly and brotherly love.
Three:
we are God's Temple (verses 20 - 22). We have a foundation. We are
"built upon the foundation of the apostles and prophets, Christ Jesus
being the chief cornerstone". But there is also the whole building
which is joined and then rises to be a holy temple, a dwelling in which
God lives by His Spirit."
I
have been involved in only one other building campaign and that was the
erection of a building in suburban Toronto by a congregation that was not
really all that anxious to sink money into bricks and mortar. Was it
spiritual? Would it deflect from our missionary giving, a high commitment
in that congregation?
But
finally, after five years in a rented auditorium we knew we had no choice.
Reluctantly the church went about establishing a building committee,
getting pledges, hiring an architect, choosing a contractor. And then one
day the architect came to me: did we want a cornerstone? A cornerstone? An
obvious need which had not occured to me! But we went through the Bible
and came up with Ephesians 2:20 "Christ Jesus himself the chief
cornerstone". It was laid on Palm Sunday, 1973.
I
came back to the congregation on Palm Sunday this year to help them
celebrate their twenty-fifth anniversary. We gathered at the end of the
service around the stone, saw slides of the day it was laid, and reflected
through that quarter of a century of achievement, that only God lays the
cornerstone for His people.
Augustus
Montague Toplady discovered that at the age of 16. He was visiting
relatives in Ireland with his widowed mother when he went to evangelistic
services held in a barn and heard "an earnest layman" preaching
on the text "You who were far off were made nigh by the blood of
Christ." The text brought him to Christ and led to the writing of
that most favorite of all hymns, "Rock of Ages".
"What
is the secret of this hymn's astonishing popularity?" a recent
hymnologist asks. Frank Colquhoun replies: "'The facts of sin and
grace are ... not transient modes of theological thought; they are
abiding, inescapable verities.' Never mind the mixed metaphors ... 'When
men are conscious of deep need, when heart condemns and conscience accuses
these very metaphors, with their combined suggestion of shelter and
cleansing, are strangely restful.'"[xlv]
"Nothing
in my hand I bring,
Simply
to thy cross I cling;
Naked,
come to thee for dress;
Helpless,
look to thee for grace;
Foul,
I to the fountain fly;
Wash
me, Saviour, or I die."
But
now you who once were far away have been brought near through the blood of
Christ ... Consequently, you are no longer foreigners and aliens, but
fellow citizens with God's people and members of God's household.
AMAZING GRACE (Ephesians):
(6) Stewards of Grace (3:1 - 13)
Why
would anyone want to commit themselves to working in a volunteer agency
like the church when there are so many - more interesting? - demands on
their shrinking leisure time? We're all so busy. Church responsibilities
are so limiting, defining, frustrating, disillusioning. Boards and
committees - as the old wag said - take minutes and consume hours and
leave you in a daze. Who needs another set of commitments, meetings,
juggling conflicting needs and desires?
Installation
Sunday is not an appropriate Sunday to ask these questions! Those who are
being ordained, set apart, have already presumably answered these
questions. As a congregation we are grateful for your willingness to serve
Christ in this way. We have seen in you those gifts that can best minister
to the needs of the whole. But let's all of us ask the question this
morning - for and with you - "What's so special about the church that
anyone would respond to that kind of demanding commitment?"
When
I am tempted to ask that question I refer to a favorite quote of mine from
a British Congregationalist minister of the turn-of-the-century, P. T.
Forsyth:
"The
Church is precious, not in itself, but because of Christ's purpose with
it. It is there because of what God has done for it. It is there, more
particularly, because of what Christ has done and done in history. It is
there solely to serve the gospel."
Or
to the words of Paul in these opening thirteen verses of Ephesians 3.
Paul, having concluded his words about Christ having broken down the
middle wall of partition between Jew and Gentile, is about to pray for
"the whole family" - verse 14 - when he is diverted both by the
thought that he is a prisoner on behalf of Gentiles but, more
significantly, the personal pronoun brings to mind his own journey.
"Surely
you have heard about the administration of God's grace that was given to
me for you, that is, the mystery." Mystery is the key word of
these verses: a mystery? Thoughts of Sunday nights on Channel 2 and
fainting women falling off pillars come to mind. Mysteries: Sherlock
Holmes, Agatha Christie, detectives, bodies, evidence, murder.
Mystery
is the key word in this passage: it comes four times. In the New Testament
mystery does not mean something spooky, but rather something
unknown until Jesus Christ came into the world. Mystery religions
might have their secrets that only initiates might know: followers of
Mithra, Isis and Osiris, Dionysius, and the Eleusis. But Christians want
everyone to know their mystery. What is it? Look at verse 6:
"This mystery is that through the gospel the Gentiles are
together with Israel, members together of one body, and sharers together
in the promise in Christ Jesus."
The
mystery is the church. This is the stupendous reality: that God has made a new humanity,
brought together into one people this amazing, motley, assortment of women
and men, of all races, of every socio-economic status. We fight and
quarrel. We are hypocrites and bunglers. We fail so often and history is
full of our contradictions. We ask: why would anyone want to get involved?
But this is the mystery: God has called us together, God is shaping
us. And being a part of the church, and specifically of its leadership,
provides a chance to stand back and watch God at work. The church is
indestructible. Why? Not because of my efforts, nor of yours, but simply
because God is here. That is the mystery. After two thousand years
of having its obituary written, the church still stands.
I. A PERSONAL PRIVILEGE: the mystery made known (verses
1 - 6)
"I
was entrusted with this unique insight into God's grace ... not made known
to men and women in other generations .. now ... revealed by the Spirit to
God's holy apostles and prophets."
And
then Paul does what we saw in chapter 1. He takes that favorite little
suffix of his "with" and, in verse 6, uses three words (one of
which he has manufactured) and dramatizes what this mystery means to us
Gentiles. You and I are 'co-heirs', 'concorporate', and 'co-sharers' of
the promise.
And
this is the word that I, Paul, was entrusted with: this is
why I gave my life, sacrificed my freedom: the wonder of
God's purposes in Christ uniting all races in Him as we are united
to one another. It's a mystery, Paul declares. Let's never lose sight of
the wonder of God's grace.
That
is what draws us to the church, and keeps us there. No other
motivation will provide the glue that bonds us to the corporate identity
of God's people. The church is central to the gospel: it is not just an
individual reality but that threefold unity: I am "in Christ",
but together Jew and Gentile, we are also bound to each other because we
are each and all "in Christ". The gospel is always first
personal. But then it must be corporate.
II A PERSONAL RESPONSIBILITY: making this mystery
known (verses 7 - 13)
Privilege
brings responsibility. Look at verse 7: "Of this gospel I was made a
minister according to the gift of God's grace which was given me."
Paul marvels at the grace that no only personally called him into such a
family, but the grace that sends someone who is "leaster" of all
saints, Paul the paulus, the small, insignificant of stature, the
blasphemer and persecutor, contemptuous in appearance, to be an emissary
for God. And that ministry, entrusted to him, has three ever-broadening
circles of influence:
(1) making Christ's riches known to the Gentiles
(verse 8) and these riches are beyond our fathoming. Translators struggle
with superlatives when they render Paul's word from Greek to English:
"unsearchable", "inexplorable",
"untraceable", "unfathomable",
"inexhaustible", "illimitable",
"inscrutable" and "incalculable".
(2) making the mystery known to all humankind
(verse 9) "enlightening" the darkness as "the
mystery" of God's equalizing grace, His multi-racial harmonizing,
becomes known to everyone.
(3) making God's wisdom known to cosmic powers (verse
10) "in its rich variety", using the church as "Exhibit
A", a living model, of His saving purpose to those in authority and
power.
And
the reality of this mystery, as we proclaim it, means that we have
resources available: (verse 13) "access to God in boldness and
confidence" so that we "may not lose heart" (verse 14) as
we are obedient to God's call and commission.
Paul
concludes then with a reminder that in the sufferings of sisters and
brothers in the church we find our "glory". We cannot escape our
common identity. We dare not side-line the church, by-pass the disciplines
it imposes, be selective in our choice of Christian fellowship. For
We
are pilgrims on a journey,
We
are brothers on the road
We
are here to help each other
Walk
the mile and bear the load.
The
mystery of Christ ... is that through the gospel (we) are sharers together in the promise in
Christ Jesus.
AMAZING GRACE (Ephesians):
(7) Praying That Reflects Our Richness in God (3:14 - 21)
In
C. S. Lewis' Screwtape Letters Wormwood, a Junior Devil, asks his
experienced Uncle Screwtape what his attitude should be toward the
attempts to pray of his baby Christian temptee.
If
you can't keep him from prayer altogether - which should be your first
line of attack - keep him focussing on feelings. Another ploy might be to
keep him praying to some imaginary thing: God as an object on a crucifix
or someone at the corner of the bedroom ceiling.
But
then there comes that desperate situation. Wormwood overhears the new
believer praying "Not to what I think You are but to what You know
Yourself to be." At that point Christian is in real peril of
discovering God and so the warning becomes intense:
"If
he has thrown aside all his thoughts and images - and the man trusts
himself to the completely real, external invisible Presence, there with
him in the room and never knowable by him as he is known by it - why then
it is that the incalculable may occur."
How
does God break in - and into - our praying? Do you and I really know, as
we pray, that we are speaking, to our Creator as we are on our knees? If
we are honest, much of our praying lacks a God-ward dimension, that
transcendence without which our intercession becomes merely an
(unconscious) soliloquy.
How
do we discover what C. S. Lewis calls "the real nakedness of the
soul in prayer"? There is only one way: immerse oneself in the
praying of the New Testament, and specifically the praying of Paul.
Of all the prayers of Paul there is none so revolutionary in its
God-intoxication as that at the end of Ephesians 3. Verses 14 - 22 are one
of the greatest prayers of the Scripture. Christ's prayer in John 17 in
the Garden is unique, of course. But Solomon's prayer at the Temple, the
prayer of the early church in Acts 4 at the release of Peter and John come
to mind.
As
Alexander Whyte says: "Who has not read and reread the closing verses
of the third chapter of
Ephesians with the feeling of one permitted to look through parted
curtains into the Holiest Place of the Christian life?"
Paul
- "the prisoner of Jesus Christ". Paul picks up the thought with
which he begins the chapter. He had been about to fall on his knees but
then, for a moment, he digresses. He reflects on the marvel of the mystery
revealed to him and which he was commissioned to make known. Now - with
this additional incentive to prayer - he intercedes, energized by the full
awareness of the measure of God's amazing grace to him and to those to
whom he writes, marvelling at the sovereign purposes of a great God.
This
prayer begins with God and ends with God. It starts with the wonder of His
redemptive and reconciling purpose as He has re-created a family of faith.
It concludes with a benediction to a God Who is able. In between, there
are four specific requests. Requests unlike anything you - or I as your
pastor - have ever prayed for the church.
Calvin
remarks that "It is therefore the duty of pastors diligently to
teach, of the people earnestly to attend to telling, and of both, to flee
to the Lord lest they weary themselves in unprofitable exertions."
I THE GROUND OF PRAYER: AFFIRMING THE PURPOSE
OF GOD (verses 14 - 16a)
Why
should we pray if we believe in a sovereign God Who is working His
purposes out: purposes that
Paul has described in the preceding part of Ephesians? If God has been
calling a people to Himself since eternity (chapter 1), powerfully including
the Gentiles as He has broken down the middle wall, then why bother to
pray?
Paul's
answer in verses 14 through 16a is simply this: that we have confidence in
the One Who has named His entire family in heaven and earth. We pray not
to change His mind, but to bring our will into accord
with His. His (verse 16a) are "the glorious riches".
And
our response? "I bow the knee." The posture expresses the sense
that Paul has of His creatureliness. It is a prostrating oneself before
One whose purposes are so great, so unfathomable, that we
are - to quote the hymn - "lost in wonder, love and
praise".
The
theology of Ephesians 1:1 through 3:14 does not eliminate the need for
prayer, it undergirds it. Indeed it is only a sovereign Lord to whom I can
make my requests known, confident that His riches will be there
for a poor beggar who comes with only a claim on His abundant and
loving grace. Anything less than that vision impoverishes prayer and
reduces it to the level of nagging. God is God: we come in that
confidence.
II THE CONTENT OF PRAYER (verses 16b - 19)
What
are Paul's four petitions to this great God?
(1) that they be strengthened by the Spirit
What
Phillips paraphrases as "the strength of the Spirit's inner
reinforcement". At Pentecost we are reminded that the Spirit came to
empower to church.
(2) that they be rooted and grounded in love
A
mixed metaphor! "Rooted" - deep in the soil of love.
"Grounded" - finding there our base of support and courage.
"With
all the saints" As we say in the Creed: "I believe .. in the communion of saints,
the forgiveness of sins." We experience God's love in community.
(3) that they know Christ's love
in
all its width. length, depth and height.
Napoleon
flung open a prison built for prisoners of conscience during the Spanish
Inquisition two hundred year before. As he did so, remains were discovered
of a prisoner who had died for his faith. The flesh had all decayed, only
bones remained. Around the ankle-bone there was a chain. But the prisoner
had left a witness. A rough cross with four words in Spanish: Above the
cross: "Height". Below, "depth". To the left,
"width". To the right: "length". That is what Paul
says might be the knowledge his readers might have.[xlvi]
Could
we with ink the oceans fill
And
were the skies of parchment made.
Were
every stalk on earth a quill
And
every man a scribe by trade -
To
write the love of God above
Would
drain the oceans dry;
Nor
could the scroll contain the whole
Though
stretched from sky to sky.
(4) that they be filled with God's fullness
He
will go on to speak about this in 4:13: "until we all reach unity in
the faith and in the knowledge of the Son of God and become mature,
attaining to the whole measure of the fullness of Christ."
III THE CONCLUSION OF PRAYER: LEAVING AFFIRMED IN
THE PURPOSE OF GOD (verses 20 - 22)
How
do we leave the audience chamber of a King? Recognizing that it is God
with Whom we have met, God Whose power is inexhaustible, unlimited.
As
Ruth Paxson paraphrased this benediction:
Unto
Him
That
is able to do
All
that we ask or think
Abundantly
above all that we ask or think
Exceedingly
abundantly above all that we ask or think
According
to the power that worketh in us.
Seven
affirmations[xlvii] are to be
found here:
(a) able to do
(b) able to do what we ask
(c) able to do what we ask or think
(d) able to all we ask or think
(e) able to do
more than we ask or think
(f) able to do much more, more abundantly,
than all we ask or think
(g) able to far more abundantly than all we
ask or think
With
that power there are only two questions we can ask ourselves: Why do we
fail to pray? And, as we do pray, why is prayer so little a resource in
our lives?
For
this reason I kneel before the Father ... that you may be filled to the
measure of all the fullness of God.
AMAZING GRACE (Ephesians):
(8) One Lord. One Faith One Baptism;
Maintaining Unity Without Imposing Uniformity
(4:1 - 6)
"I
urge - therefore - I who am a prisoner in the Lord." So Paul begins
the second half of his letter. No better joining of theology and life
could be imagined. "Therefore": the second word in the Greek
original suggests that he is building on all that he has stated in the
first three chapters.
We've
seen that breathtaking summation of the whole of Christian doctrine. The
ability Paul had to summarize the divine initiative: that before the
foundation of time you and I should be "in Christ". Jew and
Gentile together in God's new, redeemed humanity. The mystery has been
explained, revealed as it was to Paul, the "unsearchable riches in
Christ".
Theology
- at least of that depth - is not popular these days. David Wells in his
recently published No Place For Truth: Or Whatever Happened To
Evangelical Theology? speaks of the "disappearance of theology.
"...while items of belief are professed, they are increasingly
being removed from the center of evangelical life where they defined what
that life was, and they are now being relegated to the periphery where
their power to define what evangelical life should be is lost"[xlviii].
And my friend Tom Gillespie, President of Princeton Seminary, asked
- in a convocation address last September to incoming students -
"What Makes Theological Studies Theological?" and reflected that
the Christian community is in danger of falling prey to amnesia.
"Such a community must turn to its memory banks which are located in
the church's tradition and particularly in its scriptures."[xlix]
"Therefore"
- in mind of all these deep theological truths - "I" - it's
emphatic - "the prisoner who is in Christ" "urge" you.
Paul is saying that that theological truth "in Christ" is now
exceedingly precious to him. It's not some intellectual abstraction,
it's his life, it's what sustains him in the hour of death, amid
suffering. "I know that I am in Christ." The theological truth
is what makes life meaningful, bearable, eternal. Theology and
life; theory and praxis. What - we might ask - will Christians do
today if they are nurtured on the pablum of experience and stories and
"sharing pain"? We need the study of doctrine if our experience
is to be anything other than shallow and superficial.
And
what is the experience that Paul now wants to share with us? It is the
experience that he regards as essential to the Christian life - an
experience of living in community. In these opening sixteen verses of the
practical half of this letter to the churches of Asia Paul wants us to
focus on what unity is all about. He's saying: "If you have any
understanding of the theology I have been teaching you will realize that
you can't live the Christian life in splendid isolation from other
believers. There can be no lone ranger Christianity. You have no life as a
follower of Jesus - to paraphrase T. S. Eliot - if you do not have it
together."
I CHRISTIAN UNITY DEPENDS ON THE CHARACTER OF THE
BELIEVER (vs 1- 3)
"Live
a life worthy of your calling." "Worthy" actually stands
first in that order. What does it mean to be "worthy"? We are -
after all - saved by grace as we were reminded in verse 8 of chapter 2.
None of us is worthy of the God Who has called us.
Let
me illustrate. You hire a carpenter to do some work at your home. After he
has finished the job you ask, before you pay him: "Is he worthy of
that money? Is he worth what I am giving him?" Martyn Lloyd Jones
speaks of a scale: the weight - or worth - at one end must balance with
the weight at the other. My worth at one end must balance the doctrine I
have been entrusted with at the other. "They must not put all the
weight on doctrine and none on practice; nor all the weight on practice
and just a little, if any at all, on doctrine. To do so produces imbalance
and lopsidedness. The Ephesians must take great pains to see that the
scales are perfectly balanced."[l]
So
Paul continues with the five qualities that must characterize such a
balanced Christian, all intensely practical:
(1) humility - we are not saved by works lest anyone should
boast (2:8-9). Humility is where my life in community begins.
(2) meekness or gentleness
- as Christ Himself was "gentle/meek and lowly in heart (Mt. 12:28)
(3) patient - "long-suffering" which comes to us
often through suffering
(4) forebearing - which
belongs with patience
(5) peace-ful - (verse 3) "keeping the unity of the
Spirit through the bond of peace". It is the unity of the Spirit
that we are actively to maintain, being intentional, pro-active in
our diligent pursuit of unity at all times and in all ways.
II CHRISTIAN UNITY RESTS ON THE UNITY OF THE
TRIUNE GOD (vs 4 - 6)
"The
unity of the Spirit" is a natural bridge from the kind of
believer who works at unity within the community to the God on Whom such
unity and whose character it reflects. Unity, Paul says, is not some
artificial quality that is arbitrarily superimposed upon a group of
people. It is inherent in the triune reality of the life of its God -
Father, Son and Holy Spirit.
"That
they all may be one" is Jesus' oft-quoted prayer in John 17. But we
forget - to our peril - the second half. "That they may all be one as
we are one."[li] The unity
between believers is no less - and no more - than the unity between the
first and second members of the ever blessed Trinity.
So
we have these seven "one's" in verses 4 through 6. They are
probably based on an early hymn or creed to be memorized by inquirers.
They cluster around a member of the Trinity:
(1) The "one's" of the Spirit:
"One body, one Spirit, one hope." We've seen (2:16) that in one
body Christ reconciled both Jew and Gentile to Himself at the
cross. It is the Holy Spirit that brings us together - "For we were
all baptized by one Spirit into
one body - Jews or Greeks, slaves or free - and we were all given the one
Spirit to drink."[lii] So there is
a single Spirit at work in each of us, drawing us, powerfully saving us,
sanctifying us. And there is a single hope - "a sure and certain
hope" of the resurrection as we say at a grave side, and it is the
Spirit Who strengthens and empowers that hope.
(2) The "one's" of the Son
- In verse 5 we discover that there is "one Lord, one faith, one
baptism". A single Lord Jesus over all, a single faith we profess in
Him as Savior and Lord, and a single baptism by which we die in Him and
are raised to Him.
(3) The "one" of the Father
- Finally in verse 6 we reminded that there is "one God and Father of
all, who is over all and through all and in all". Paul has progressed
from the effect - the Holy Spirit - to the Cause - the Father.
This
is the unity which we experience - or should. The Christian is united to
her sister, her brother, his sister, his brother, because she or he is
united to God. We are called to life together. And that means an
amazing diversity.
Some
of us have been - or are - aware of that diversity during our holidays. I
think back last Sunday to a small thousand year old church in a field in
idyllic rural England where a lay reader read a five minute sermon to the
thirteen of us who were present. Two weeks ago I was in my ancestral
church, seated on the first pew from the front where the MacLeod's have
worshipped since the church was opened in 1910 - the service all in
Gaelic. Or three weeks ago, a tiny hall under a mount in the English
Lakes, filled with communicants celebrating the sacrament.
Or
we think of the three with us this morning and where they will be in a
week or two's time: Jim Thomas out in Chiangmai with believers in Thai,
José Matos in a prison chapel with convicts discovering the liberty
Christ offers, Emmanuel and Susan and Samuel back with their own in the
Cameroon.
Isn't
the family of God wonderful? They will be there because Newton
Presbyterian Church has made - and is making - its small contribution. We
will never be together in the same combination as we are today, but
there will come a time when we will, finally, be all together in the
eternity of God's love. And heaven will be the richer because of who we
are but - praise God - who that triune Lord is. For Jesus' prayer that
"we shall all be one as He and the Father are one" will at last
be answered. And then all fetters of our divisions and separations will
fall.
Live
a life worthy of the calling you have recreived ... There is one Spirit ..
one Lord .. one God and Father of all ... over all and through all and in
all.
AMAZING GRACE (Ephesians):
(9) Body Life:
Maintaining Unity Without Imposing Uniformity
(4:7 - 16)
Last
Sunday, as we began our study of the second half of Ephesians - the
"practical half that seeks to link the theological profundity of
chapters 1 through 3 with the realities of life together in relationship -
we noted that Paul is concerned for the unity of the Christian
family. This unity we observed requires a certain kind of person (4: -
3) and is grounded on the objective character of the Triune God, the
united Father, Son and Holy Spirit.
We
are now, beginning in verse 7 through verse 16, to discover two further
reasons why the Christian community must be united: because of the mutual
interconnectedness of our gifts (verses 7 through 12) and the demand for
Christian growth and maturity (verses 13 through 16).
III. THE MUTUAL INTERCONNECTEDNESS OF OUR GIFTS (verses
7 - 12)
The
contrast between verse 6 and verse 7 could not be more marked. In verse 6
we learn of a Father "over all, through all and in all". Verse 7
starts "But" to "each". Paul goes
from the unity of the Father in the blessed Trinity to the diversity
of His people. As verse 7 has been paraphrased: "Naturally, there are
different gifts and functions; individually grace is given to us in
different ways out of the rich diversity of Christ's giving."
(a) Christ is the Source of our diversity:
The image in verse 7 is that of a victorious Monarch, showering gifts on
his subjects. It is an adjustment of Psalm 68[liii].
The reference is then transferred to Christ Who died, returned to His
Father, and as our ascended Lord, dispenses gifts to the church.
What is the significance of this? It is two-fold:
because the gifts have been given by Christ they are to be used for the
purpose for which he intended them. They are not to be squandered on
ourselves. Rather, they are to be used for the service of the people of
God.
Secondly, since every follower of Christ has been
given a gift, all are called to ministry. Juan Carlos Ortiz said, in a
famous message given at Lausanne '74, that ministers are the cork in the
bottle. We are keeping the word from getting out. But all have a
gift, everyone is to use their gift, and an organization that elevates one
or two people over the whole is in deep trouble.
A friend of mine, George Mallone, reports the
following conversation reported Sunday morning by a parishioner whose
husband was an elder from the dinner table the night before among three of
her children.
Geoffrey:
Do the Mallones go to our church?
Betsy:
That's Eryn Faye and Scott's mom and dad!
Jenny:
Of course they do. Mr. Mallone is the head of our church.
Geoffrey:
And Daddy too?
Jenny:
Well, sort of. He sets up the chairs. Mr. Mallone is there every
day so he's
the head of our church.[liv]
(b) This diversity is rich and complex:
The gifts - or charismata - are very
comprehensive. The various lists in the New Testament - Romans 12, I
Corinthians 12, and elsewhere are never intended to be exhaustive. Here
Paul mentions only five: "He (verse 11) gave s some to
be apostles, some to be prophets, some to be evangelists, and some to be
pastors and teachers."
All five of these gifts relate to teaching - as
John Stott notes[lv]. While there
are no apostles or prophets today in the Biblical sense, we need the
authoritative word that they gave. We need a teaching evangelism, a
pastoring that is profoundly instructional, and a teaching that is in
accord with the will of God.
The Presbyterian - Puritan, Reformed - model of
minister was of the scholar-teacher whose main responsibility was in the
study. We have been accused of "dying by degrees" but the
alternative - a frenetic, Kiwanian, back-slapping, organizational genius -
is surely one of the reasons why we are a declining denomination. We have,
somewhere along the way, lost the heart of our distinctiveness.
(c) Our diverse gifts serve a single purpose:
Look at verse 12: "to prepare God's people for works of
service". We are called to be servants of each other. The gifts are
not to be paraded, used as ego-gratification, held up as reasons for
spiritual superiority. "Brother - or sister - let me be your
servant" should be the motto of the followers of One Who said:
"I came not be ministered unto but to minister and to give my
life."[lvi]
The order of the towel is the mark of the family of faith.
IV. THE DEMAND FOR CHRISTIAN GROWTH AND MATURITY (verses
13 -16)
Paul
then explains what it means - verse 12 - "to build up the body of
Christ". Verse 13 introduces that key word "Maturity".
The whole purpose of the family of faith, the reason why God calls us to
mutual accountability within a community, why there can be no Christian
living in isolation, is that only by this means can we be all that God
wants us to be. And what is that? Our heavenly Parent wants His child to
be mature, grown-up. He does not want us to be perpetually
dependent, much less kept in trainers or even diapers. He wants us fully
grown, on our own, adult, mature.
In
the book our youth use for their preparation for confirmation John Stott
says: "Our churches are full of Christians who were not only born
again years ago, but who stopped growing years ago. This is a tragedy
beyond description. God's purpose is that we should grow physically,
mentally, emotionally and spiritually ... Hundreds of Christians suffer
from infantile regression of the spirit. They have never grown up."[lvii]
What
does it mean for a Christian to be mature? J. C. Ryle, Bishop of
Liverpool in the last century defines it: "That his (or her) sense of
sin is becoming deeper, his (or her) faith stronger, his (or her) hope
brighter, his (or her) love more extensive, his (or her) spiritual
mindedness more marked."
Growth
in truth:
verse 14 speaks of no longer being infants, tossed back and forth by the
waves, and blown here and there by every wind of teaching and by the
cunning and craftiness of men in their deceitful scheming." As Peter
says "As newborn babes, desire the sincere milk of the Word that you
may grow thereby."[lviii]
We
not only learn the truth, discriminating truth, differentiating
it from error, but we speak - and live - the truth. But
always in love, for maturity means, secondly, to
Growth
in love:
verse 16 - "the whole body joined and held together by every
supporting ligament, grows and builds itself up in love." As Thomas
Watson, the old Puritan said: "The right manner of growth is to grow
less in one's own eyes ... This is good, to grow out of conceit with
oneself." As the hymn has
it
"I
ask Thee for a thoughtful love,
Through
constant watching wise,
To
meet the glad with joyful smiles,
And
to wipe the weeping eyes;
And
a heart at leisure from itself,
To
soothe and sympathize."[lix]
Growth
into Christ:
verse 15 "we will in all things grow up into him who is the Head,
that is, Christ". Monsignor Knox took the imagery of the baby with
the huge head, out of proportion to the rest of the body, and how
gradually the whole body grows into harmony with its head. So the
Christian develops the full stature of the adult-hood size of Jesus its
Head.
We
bought a home many years ago in Toronto that we could only afford because
it had been grossly neglected during three years of tragic divorce
wrangling between a father and mother over the custody of their two small
sons. We had to do extensive painting and renovations and in an upstairs
bedroom closet there was the most tragic thing I had ever seen. Along the
wall there were the marks of the height of each of their sons, lovingly
inscribed by father and mother. And then, suddenly, three years before,
those marks stopped. The mother took the boys to New Zealand. The Father
would never see his sons bgrow any taller.
We
replaced it with a measure of our own as the boys started to shoot up in
height and the comparison was always on my mind. There are Christians,
torn apart by forces of hatred and anger, often beyond anything for which
they are directly responsible, whose growth is stunted. Then there are
others, whose growth is progressive and continuous.
Paul
says that we need each other in open and caring relationships, each
serving the other, within the body. For the church exists for one purpose
only and that is: maturity. And without a certain kind of member,
reflecting the harmony that is God's in the Trinity, utilizing all the
gifts, the great end of the church can never be reached.
Speaking
the truth in love, we will in all things grow up into Him who is the Head,
that is, Christ.
AMAZING GRACE (Ephesians):
(10) Learning and Living Christ
(4:17 - 5:2)
"So
I tell you this, and insist on it in the Lord." Thus Paul, in verse
17 of chapter 4 of Ephesians, begins the last section of his great letter.
The wording makes us look back to verse 1 of the same chapter: "As a
prisoner for the Lord, then, I urge you...".
The
apostle is speaking with authority, reminding his readers of their
obligation to follow his instructions - not because they are his private
hobby horse, but because he speaks for the Lord Jesus Christ Himself. And
what he says has to do with the ethical demands of the gospel: he is
concerned - note the wording of the rest of verse 17 "that (they)
must no longer live as the Gentiles do". He is suggesting that there
are moral absolutes that they, as followers of THE LORD, must be obedient
to, discipline their lives by, be committed for.
Who
speaks for God in our time? Our apostles all have feet of clay: we read
about the fallen religious idols of our day. Ministers are caught in sin
and have to resign their pulpits. Some television "evangelists"
... need I say more. Prominent religious writers no longer follow their
own advice. The list is legion, reflecting the moral chaos of our time.
Who
speaks for God? This book we have before us: the Biblical standards of
morality are based on a clear understanding that Jesus is the Lord:
absolute in his demands that we do not live as those around us, that we
march to a different drum beat, that the gospel liberates us to reflect
the holiness and truth of a God that made us not only to reflect His
teaching, but model our lives after One who exemplified that law and those
commandments.
So
we being this final section of the book we call Ephesians: learning how
not only to make a difference, but to be different, to live
as children of light. But before he gets into specifics, Paul sets the
doctrinal context for Christian behavior.
I RIGHT LIVING STARTS WITH RIGHT THINKING (verses
17 - 24)
What
is particularly striking about Paul's ethical imperatives is that he
starts with the mind. When asked what is wrong with the way pagans live he
does not itemize their conduct. He speaks rather of "the futility of
their thinking", that they are "darkened in their
understanding" and "separated from God because of the ignorance
that is in them". Empty minds, darkened understanding, inward
ignorance: these are the first things one can state about the person whose
conduct is morally objectionable. What we do comes from what we think.
(a) The way of the world (vs 17-19):
The
concluding observation in verse 19 is a summary of the teaching of these
three verses: the god-less person has a porosis of the heart, a
hardening, a callous, a calcification of what should be soft and tender
towards God.
As
you read these three verses you become aware of the parallels between this
passage and the last half of Romans chapter one. As John Stott notes[lx], there are
four stages in turning one's back on God:
1. obstinacy - their hardness of heart (verse 18) as
humankind suppresses the truth (Romans 1:18), refusing to honor God"
(1:21), unwilling to acknowledge God (vs 28).
2. darkness - "the futility of their thinking (verse 17
here) or (Romans 1:19) "their thinking became futile and their
foolish hearts were darkened". Here we read that "they are
darkened in their understanding .. because of the ignorance that is in
them" (verse 18) and in Romans 1:22: "they became fools",
their mind (1:28) "depraved".
3. judgment - as a result they - verse 18 - were
"separated from the life of God" or - as Paul in Romans
"God gave them over" (verse 24), "God gave them over"
(verse 26), and again, verse 28, "he gave them over". Sinful
desire, lust, a depraved ind - God no longer restrained them from the
logical conclusion of their thinking.
4. recklessness
- the description of humankind's moral sewer in verse 19 is unflinching:
" sensuality so as to indulge in every kind of impurity, with a
continual lust for more". Or the conclusion of Romans 1:
"filled with every kind of wickedness, evil, greed and
depravity."
Wait
a minute, you say. It's too sweeping, this narrow-minded description of
human peccadilloes. But the description of life in the First Century Roman
Empire is little different from life at the end of the Twentieth Century.
The more things change the more they remain the same.
(b) The way of Christ (vs 20-24):
"You,
however, did not come to know Christ that way." The emphasis is again
on the mind, and it is reiterated in verses 21 "You heard of him and
were taught in him" and again (verse 22) "You were
taught...". The emphasis here was on instruction. They were
trained in "the truth that is in Jesus".
What
is that way? Verses 22 - 24 instruct us: "to put off your old self
... to be made new ... to put on the new self, created to be like
God". In other words to
be a Christian demands a whole different way of life, a tearing up by the
roots our old manner of living and a one eighty change so that we have one
desire: to be like God "in true righteousness and holiness".
We
were called to take off one set of clothing - filthy, ragged, polluted,
and now to put on a new set - fresh, clean, beautiful. We are confronted
with the imperatives of the gospel: the transforming grace of God which
makes us brand new. We are in a word - transformed, different, special. No
longer do we see how close we can get to the edge without falling in, but
we are rather anxious to go as far as we can away from the old and move
towards God.
II RIGHT LIVING DEMANDS SPECIFIC ATTITUDES (verses
25 - 5:2)
Now
Paul provides five illustrations of this principle, providing in each a
contrast:
(a) put off falsehood, put on truthfulness (vs
25) As Samuel Johnson once stated, urging parents to insist on accuracy:
"It is more from carelessness about truth than from intentional lying
that there is so much falsehood in the world."[lxi]
The reason for the insistence on truth is that "we are members of one
body" and falsehood of any kind tears down that atmosphere of trust
that is essential if good relationships are to prevail.
(b) put off anger, refuse to give the devil a
foothold (vs 26-7) The new life of the Christian is supposed to deal
openly with anger, refusing to let it fester, not allowing a day to pass
without keeping close accounts not only with God but with our neighbor,
our family, our spouse, our children. In that way the devil will not even
have a foothold.
(c) put off theft, put on stewardship (vs 28)
Theft is not simply a matter of robbery: it is also the inability to use
what is our for God's glory, and to realize that we are stewards. We are
called to work both to do something "useful" but also in order
to be able to share with those in need. A poor steward is robbing God and
her or his neighbor.
(d) put off idle gossip, put on edifying
conversation (vs 29-30) Refusal to let "unwholesome talk" come
from our mouths is only the negative - positively we are to see, through
our conversation to "edify" or "build others up according
to their needs that it may benefit those who listen." And in that way
we will not (verse 30) "grieve" the Holy Spirit who lives within
us and is the silent Witness to our every word and Who has sealed us
"until that day".
(f) put off bitterness, put on love (vs
31-5:2) And finally, as a summation, Paul deals with the most fundamental
problem among Christians - as indeed among all of humankind -
"bitterness". The antidote to
our feelings about others and the way they - and life- has treated
us is to (verse 32) be kind and considerate, focussing not on those who
have wronged us but being "imitators of God" recognizing that we
God's "dearly loved children" secure in His affection,
"forgiving each other" because God in Christ has forgiven us -
loving us and giving Himself up for us."
"Imitators
of God" - literally mimics of God, called to repeat after
Him, copy Him, echo what He says, replicate His actions. As the Sarum
Primer of 1514 had children learn:
"God
be in my head
and
in my understanding;
God
be in my eyes,
and
in my looking;
God
be in my mouth,
and
in my speaking;
God
be in my heart,
and
in my thinking;
God
be at my end,
and
at my departing."
Be
imitators of God, therefore, as dearly loved children and live a life of
love, just as Christ loved us and gave himself up for us.
AMAZING GRACE (Ephesians):
(11) Sexual Purity
(5:3 - 21)
At
a quarter to five this past Thursday afternoon I was visiting in a nursing
home as the Pope touched down in Denver. Surrounded by women in their
eighties and nineties I heard him say in his heavily accented English:
"In
developed countries, a serious moral crisis is already affecting the lives
of many young people, leaving them adrift, often without hope, and conditioned
to look only for instant gratification. Only by instilling a high moral
vision can a society insure that its young people are given the
possibility to mature as free and intelligent human beings, endowed with a
robust sense of responsibility to the common good, capable of working with
others to create a community and a nation with a strong moral
fiber."
The
appeal to youth in a room full of the elderly struck me as wildly
paradoxical. What could these
women, born as the Twentieth Century was still young, understand of the
moral pressures that are a part of our society as that century concludes?
What do they know of - much less understand - that "moral
crisis", of "instant gratification"? What sort of help
could they provide for grandchildren and great-grandchildren who are a
part of the moral muddle of our time?
Paul
the old man, is advising the Christian communities in west Asia Minor,
almost two millennia ago, as to how they are to conduct their lives in a
society that could also be characterized as "without hope" and
filled with "instant gratification". I've been in Ephesus twice
recently and been amazed as tanned and pot-bellied European tourists, with
a minimum of clothing, seem to have only one place they want to see. They
walk by the statues, the fountains, the restored facade of the Library of
Celsus, the amphitheater seating 50,000. But they linger with fascination
as their tour guide explains the lurid sign pointing to a First Century
local house of prostitution. Ogling, cameras at the ready, it seems not
only a reminder of the continuing human fascination with sex but also a
recognition that little has changed during the intervening years.
The
theme of verses 3 through 21 of Ephesians 5 is timely: moral - and
particularly sexual - purity. Paul begins by providing a kind of bridge
between what he has said about the difference between Christian and
pagan as he provides a sixth distinguishing characteristic
of the believer. "But among you there must not be even a hint of
sexual immorality, or of any kind of impurity, or of greed, because
these are improper for God's holy people." He continues - verse 4
- to say that "obscenity, foolish talk" and "coarse
joking" are likewise out for the one who does more than merely
professing faith in Christ.
But
these standards are so high, we say. "What do you know about sexual
purity?", youth demands of the aging apostle, as they do of
presumably aging parents. Do you know anything about raging hormones,
testosterone levels, the magnetism of sexual desire? What is it that helps
a Christian who is committed to moral purity live an exemplary life in a
decadent and sex-obsessed culture? Is there anything more helpful than the
naive 'Just say no'? Paul suggests four - what John Stott calls[lxii] -
"incentives to moral purity".
I THE RECOGNITION OF THE REALITY OF JUDGMENT (vs
5 - 7)
Paul's
statement in verse 5 is categorical. "No immoral, impure, or greedy
person .. has any inheritance in the kingdom of Christ and of God."
It is explained by a parenthesis - a person given over to idolatry. It is
not the single thought or lust or even action that is condemned. It is the
habitual giving in to immorality, impurity, greed, that is condemned. It
is the inability to confess sin, seek a cleansed and forgiven fresh start,
that is at issue. There is pardon for all sin: but the one who falls into
such must ask for forgiveness and pardon. And it is only a powerful Force
other than ourselves that can release us from the yoke of compulsive and
escalating lust.
For
such a person "given up" (as we saw in verses 17 - 19 of the
previous chapter) to fornication or greed, there will be judgment.
Judgment is not a word we like to use but we are reminded in verse 6 of
the "wrath" of God - His implacable hatred of anything less than
His nature. And we are not to be deceived - self-deception is a trap - in
spite of what others may say, in spite of the popular culture of our time,
there is judgment at the end. "Do not be partners" with such.
The original means that we are not to participate with them.
Judgment
then is a powerful - but in our time, neglected - incentive for holy
living. We are to recognize that evil brings its own punishment. The first
reason for moral purity is negative. The next is positive.
II THE RECOGNITION OF THE DIFFERENCE CHRIST HAS
MADE (vs 8 - 14)
Paul's
next reason for holy living is not future but past: Christ has made a
difference. Once you were in darkness, but now you are in the light. To
live with purity is to live being true to one's identity. We are people -
I am a person - of the light. And the fruit (verse 9) of light is a
new nature, characterize by "all that is good and right and
true".
We
are now given a new set of desires: the Christians concern is "what
is pleasing to the Lord". Our lives are open to the light. We are
transparent. We do not have secrets, skeletons in the closet. No reporter
can dig into our past and ruin our reputation. We are glad to be exposed,
for there is nothing that we are afraid of revealing. Jesus Christ has
made our lives an "open book". There is no hidden microphone
which can reveal secrets nor a microphone we think is switched off which
blares out our inconsistencies.
So
our prayer is simply this:
"I
want to walk like a child of the light
The
light of my life is Jesus.
In
Him there is no darkness at all.
The
light of my life is Jesus."
III THE RECOGNITION OF TRUE WISDOM (vs 15 -
17)
Paul
then adduces a third reason for moral living. Christians are
wise. We are called to "look carefully ... how (we) walk". We
are to take great care as we conduct our lives. And particularly this has
reference to our use of time, "making the most of (our) time" -
weakly translated in the NIV "making the most of every
opportunity".
This
summer I spent a day in the Edinburgh City Library reading through a four
year diary of my wife's grandfather's grandfather. From the years 1842 -
1846 Charles Cowan had recorded week every hour he had spent and on what
activity. You may call him compulsive, but his business, church, family
and social life was all spelled out. No wonder that he was able to be
instrumental in the founding of the Free Church of Scotland, achieve great
business success, serve as an active elder in his local congregation and
raise nine children. He was one who "made the most of .. time".
For
time is a resource we all share: but the commodity is soon exhausted and
we look back over a life either spent in the pursuit of personal pleasure
or the greater good of God and neighbor. An incentive to righteous living
is the simple quatrain:
"Only
one life,
'Twill
soon be past,
Only
what's done for Christ,
Will
last."
IV THE RECOGNITION OF THE HOLY SPIRIT'S
INFILLING (vs 18-21)
Paul
has said that these Christians are "sealed with the Holy Spirit"
(1:13) and that they must never grieve that Spirit (4:30). Now we tells
them - 4:19 - that they are called to holiness because they are to go on
continuously being filled with the Holy Spirit.
And
when we are filled with the Holy Spirit there are four characteristics:
(1) speaking to one another -
in stead of the "obscenity, foolish talk or coarse joking" of
verse 4 there should be conversation that is edifying and uplifting --
"psalms, hymns and spiritual songs".
(2) singing to one another -
making music in our hearts. Music has the power to redirect our emotions
and channel our energies
(3) thanking one another
- gratitude is an antidote to restless desire and lust
(4) submitting to one another -
establishing accountability within the body and accepting reproof or
admonition when we have lost the way. Impurity is always
self-gratification. Living a life open to others, and in their service,
frees us from the introspective fulfilling of personal desire.
No
one exemplified this struggle to be moral in an immoral society better
than Augustine. Do you recall
his prayer - as he describes it in his Confessions - "Give me
chastity and continence, but not yet." And then he adds candidly
"For I was afraid that You would hear my prayer too soon, and too
soon would heal me from the disease of lust which I wanted satisfied
rather than extinguished."[lxiii]
And then one day he heard that voice: "Tolle lege, tolle lege."
"Take and read, take and read." And his eye fell on Romans
13:13: "Not in orgies and drunkenness, not in sexual immorality or
debauchery, not in dissension and jealousy, but, rather, clothe yourselves
with the Lord Jesus Christ and do not think how to gratify the desires of
the sinful nature." He
recalls his reaction: "I had no wish to read further, and no need.
For in that instant, with the very ending of the sentence, it was as
though a light of utter confidence shone in all my heart, and all the
darkness of uncertainty vanished away."[lxiv]
For
you were once darkness, but now you are light in the Lord. Live as
children of light.
AMAZING GRACE (Ephesians):
(12) Wedded Bliss
(5:21 - 33)
One
of my favorite comments about marriage is the Pfeiffer cartoon that
appeared about seven years ago. A woman is in bed, thinking about men.
"Men are selfish," she reflects. "Thoughtless.
Self-righteous. Self-=pitying. Insensitive, Overbearing. And hate to talk
to their wives ... unless it's a monologue.: She continues: "And
after they've been married a few years, men never say, 'I love you.'"
Then suddenly, in the final panel, you see that there's a man there as
well. "Hey, I'm here, ain't I?" he yells as the woman
gnashes her teeth with a look of quiet desperation.
Mary
Hunt in her Fierce Tenderness: A Feminist Theology of Friendship
has stated that "Economic, political, psychological, and other
differences between the genders result in the fact that women find it
difficult to be friends with men and vice versa".[lxv]
Or as Harry Burns says in the 1989 movie When Harry Met Sally as he
is driving Sally from Chicago to New York "Men and women can't be
friends - because the sex part always gets in the way."
Paul
has just finished speaking about sexual purity. He's been direct about the
need for chastity, continence and abstinence outside the marriage
relationship. He is now to give one of the most radical statements about
Christian marriage to be found in the New Testament.
Nowhere
is the Christian counter-culture more profoundly at odds with its First
Century culture than in the area of marriage. Rome had vested women with
property and inheritance rights, and had given them - at least in theory -
a position better than that of Greece. There women had been chattels,
without any identity or value of their own, usually pawns for political,
economic or social advancement. However, "Most women were still
considered to be very much inferior to and remained under the dominance of
their husbands."[lxvi] And First
Century society was characterized by "a general moral decline ...
marked by the growing prevalence of divorce and the disintegration of
family life."[lxvii]
Today
we face a similar situation. "Marriage has been robbed of its meaning
... marriage is in a mess," notes Christian feminist Elaine Storkey.
In spite of all efforts to the contrary the wife "is vulnerable and
economically defensive; her identity .. often embedded in her domestic
roles."[lxviii] And the
answer to this, our feminist and humanist friends tell us, is that the
woman, the wife, find fulfillment outside of marriage. But - Storkey notes
- its is exactly the quest for self-fulfillment, self-achievement,
self-growth and self-service that has led men to become the
bullies that they often are. For women to go that same route "can
only make the situation worse". "A Christian ... recognizes the
hollowness of contemporary forms or marriage (but) would not rush to
champion these against more trothful and committed relationships where no
wedding has taken place ... but for a Christian ... their alternatives are
not acceptable".[lxix]
It
is in this context that we need to discover the alternative offered here
in Ephesians 5:21 - 33.
I. THE CONTEXT OF MARRIAGE: SUBMISSION WITHIN
COMMUNITY (vs 21 - 25)
"Wives,
submit to your husbands." Our
hackles are raised: today when I ask a prospective bride as we discuss the
wedding ceremony: "Do you want to 'obey' your husband?" they
look at me with utter consternation, totally unaware that in an earlier
age women promised to obey their husbands!
"Submission" - as I stated in a sermon July 29, 1990, on
I Peter 2:11 - 3:7 - "is the revolutionary new principle of
conducting inter-personal relationships that Christianity
introduced." And I
defined it as "mutual respect between people who are joined together
with interconnecting responsibilities".[lxx]
It never implies inferiority, dominance, nor is it arbitrary: one
could call it "ordered authority".
It is exemplified in the attitude of Jesus Christ, who was
submissive even to the cross. Wives
are to submit to husbands "in the Lord".
Note
that verses 21 and 22 of Ephesians 5 go together: "submission to one
another ... wives submit to your husbands". We take the one without
the other at our peril. There is a mutuality of commitment - commitment
always within the community, so that our interconnectedness is
recognized. Marriage for the Christian is never a "haven from the
world"[lxxi], nor is it
a matter of personal indulgence. A Christian marriage is always
open: inclusive of the rest of the community, particularly those who are
single, those who are struggling, those who need the security and the
modeling of a loving and caring relationship where they have experienced
only pain and rejection previously.
If
the relationship between husband and wife is similar to that between
Christ and the body of which He is head, then it follows that the church
is of critical importance to a marriage that is worthy of being called
"Christian". Indeed the quality of marriage, as a primary
relationship within the body, determines the quality of many other
relationships within the church. That is why husbands and wives must together
be committed together to whatever task the one or the other undertakes in
the church. The church is called to protect marriages, to help to take
pro-active responses when marriages are threatened, and to defend its
witness when the "marriage bed is not held in honor".
II. THE COMMITMENT OF MARRIAGE: LOVE WITHOUT
LIMIT (vs 26 - 33)
Isn't
it interesting that the bulk of Paul's teaching on marriage is directed to
the husband. He proceeds in verse 26 and for the rest of the chapter to
lecture husbands on their obligations: if the submission of wives is
related to the Lord and His attitude, then the love he commends to their
spouse is to have two qualities:
(a) love your wife as you care for your own body:
as we daily care for our bodies so we should care for the one who is
"one flesh" with us. As we are concerned for its health and
purity so we should be vigilant for the health and purity of our
marriages. As we cleanse our bodies, so we are reminded of the cleansing
activity of Christ as He desires His Bride be "without spot or
wrinkle or any other blemish" (verse 27)
(b) love your wife as Christ loved the church:
an agape love, giving as Jesus gave Himself at Calvary. The husband
is to exemplify in his love for his partner that of Christ on the cross:
"who came not to be served but to serve and to give His life."
The
following wedding prayer was written by Temple Gairdner, the great
missionary to Egypt before his wedding:
"That
I may come near to her
Draw
me nearer to You than to her.
That
I may know her
Make
me to know you more than her.
That
I may love her
With
the love of a perfectly whole heart,
Cause
me to love You more than her and most of all."
Which
is the practical expression of
"Husbands
love your wives, just as Christ loved the church."
AMAZING GRACE (Ephesians):
(13) Ties That Bind
(6:1 - 9)
It
was a marriage invitation like none other. Martin Luther asks his friend
Leonard Kopp to attend the nuptials, scheduled for June 27, 1525: "I
am to be married on Thursday. My lord Katie and I invite you to send a
barrel of the best Torgau beer, and if it is not good you will have to
drink it all yourself."
At
ten on the morning of his wedding Luther led Katherine through the streets
of Wittenberg to the parish church and there at the door the religious
ceremony was observed. Then a banquet in the cloister and a dance at the
town hall. In the evening another banquet, and by eleven all the guests
"took their departure on pain of being sent home by the
magistrates."
But
then on their wedding night there was a knock at the door. It was Andreas
Carlstadt, fleeing the Peasant's Revolt. Could he be allowed in for the
night? There began a long record of hospitality in which, in addition to
their six children, the Luther household had as many as twenty-five guests
at any one time!
From
this household there came Luther's Table Talk, the longest of his
books: 6,596 entries in all, full of pithy sayings that guests had culled
from dinner time conversation. Over meals, "Luther ranged from the
ineffable majesty of God the Omnipotent to the frogs in the Elbe. Pigs,
popes, pregnancies, politics and proverbs jostle one another."[1]
His sayings are full of pithy wisdom: "Spoil the rod and spoil the
child - that is true. But beside the rod keep an apple to give him when he
has done well." To Martin Luther faith was something to talk about in
the home, at the table, while eating.
No
wonder Martin Luther, in his children's Catechism, was the one who
first called these instructions for the conduct of household relations
at the end of Paul's letters Haustafeln - literally "tables
of household duties". They are simple, domestic and very practical.
In Ephesians they fall under the general rubric of 5:21: "Submit to
one another out of reverence for Christ." They deal with relationships:
husband and wife in 5:22-33 and now, 6:1-4, children and parents, and,
6:5-9, masters and children.
This
advice, scholars have discovered, was typical of the Jews with their halakah
and even Gentile - and particularly Stoic - literature. But for
Christians such regulations are unique: they represent what John Stott
calls "the Christian counter culture". We've noted how women are
treated in a way that is radically different from the society around them.
We will observe now that two other radically marginalized and oppressed
groups are also raised to dignity and value: children and slaves.
I. CHILDREN-PARENTS (vs 1 - 4)
A
father's attitude toward his children is summarized by a Roman soldier
stationed in Alexandria, Egypt, writing to his pregnant wife: "If -
good luck to you! - you have a child, if it is a boy, let it live; if it
is a girl, throw it out!"
A Roman father had absolute control over his family. He could sell them
into slavery, make them work in the fields, even in chains; ne could even
inflict the death penalty on his child. And, further, "the power
of the Roman father extended over the child's whole life, so long as the
father lived. A Roman son never came of age."
This was the patria potestas, the father's power.
Now
Paul shows a different way to conduct parent-child relationships. And, in
keeping with the principle of submission, he begins with
(1) The duty of children (vs 1-3)
"Children,
obey your parents in the Lord, for this is right." Paul's instruction
to children is not only premised on their Christian obligation ("in
the Lord") but the general recognition that all humankind recognizes
a bond of loyalty to parents on the part of children. Indeed, we are not
surprised when elsewhere he speaks of a mark of a decadent society as
being characterized by those who are "disobedient to parents".
The
reason for this is adduced from the fifth commandment - "Honor your
father and mother", which he speaks of as the first of the Ten
"with a promise".
That promise is long life and prosperity: "that it may go well with
you and that you may enjoy long life on the earth".
Now
this raises two very practical questions: Is the command unconditional?
And to whom is it addressed?
Is
the command unconditional?
Are children always to obey their parents in everything?
That's what the parallel verse in Colossians (3:20) says.
I
think that "in the Lord" gives a caveat: for those who have
non-Christian parents, actively opposed to their faith and way of life,
some commands must be disobeyed. What of proscribing church attendance?
Baptism? What of insisting on dishonesty, immorality, or hypocrisy
("keeping up family appearances")? These are all issues that
depend on the degree of independence one has assumed. It also begs the
second question:
To
whom is it addressed? Does this refer only to children who have yet to reach the age of
majority? As long as they are under the same roof? Until they are
financially independent? As Stott notes "Even after we have attained
our majority .. and are no longer under the authority of our parents, and
are therefore no longer under obligation to 'obey' them, we still must
continue to 'honour' them."
Honoring
parents as adults is a costly business. We children are also parents:
caught in the squeeze between young adults sons and daughters gaining
independence and parents losing theirs. The obligations to aging parents
are increasingly a serious moral (and practical) concern as the age span
lengthens and the quantity of life (and not necessarily its quality)
increases.
(2) The duty of fathers (vs 4)
But
verse 4 points out that fathers have a corresponding responsibility:
"Fathers, do not exasperate your children, instead, bring them up in
the training and instruction of the Lord." "Do not goad your
children into resentment." (NEB)
A
whole theology of Christian family life and church education has been
built on this verse. You will not that it is both negative ("don't
exasperate your children") and positive ("bring them up in the
training and instruction of the Lord").
Fathers:
do you ever get "exasperated" with your children? As Martyn
Lloyd Jones asks from this text: "When you are discipling a child,
you should have first controlled yourself ... What right have you to say
to your child that he needs discipline when you obviously need it
yourself? Self-control, the control of temper, is an essential
prerequisite in the control of others."
Instead,
we are to bring children up in a disciple that is "the Lord's".
As parents we sit under the discipline of our heavenly Parent. We are
learning in the school of Christ. So the lessons we have been taught are
to be passed on to our children; the disciplines which we submit ourselves
to - prayer and Bible-reading particularly - are to be passed on to our
children. Most Christian education in the home is caught not taught.
II. SLAVES-MASTERS (vs 5 - 9)
(1) The duty of slaves (5-8)
Paul
then goes on to speak of another marginalized group: slaves. Over half the
population of the Roman Empire were slaves - some 60 million in all. They
included all levels of society - the intelligentsia, the manual laborer.
"They were only chattels without rights, whom their master could
treat virtually as he pleased."
In
the light of this arbitrary authority Paul asks slaves to remember that
their ultimate Employer is Christ. They are not to be divided in their
loyalty as they work but to realize that they are serving their Lord Who
is Jesus in their work. They are to render service "as to the
Lord", knowing that it is to Him alone that they are accountable.
(2) The duty of masters (9)
are
discussed in three ways:
(a) treat them as you would be treated yourself
(b) forebear threatening - the dehumanizing
effect of control based on coercion
(c) remember Christ is there in your
relationship, master of both employer and employee, impartial as an
Arbitrator, the one to Whom we are ultimately accountable.
There
was a man, whose story I have heard often, who found himself, at the age
of 35, at a crossroads. His marriage was in a shambles, thanks to
excessive drinking. He had lost his appetite for work and his
fellow-employees found him irritable, cross, and unreasonable. As a
supervisor he was a disaster.
A
training course in his business sent him south for several months. He was
invited to a service where an invitation was given. He went through what
he would later admit to his wife's consternation was a "born
again" experience. He returned home to the skepticism of his family:
would it last - in Boston of all places? Was it "real"?
Recently
his wife spoke to me: "It's the tenth anniversary!" I found
myself wracking my brain: "Tenth anniversary of what?" I
thought. "It was ten years ago today", she went on to explain,
"that - her husband's name - had that time in the south."
"It's lasted. He's a different father, a different husband, and a
different man on the job than he was before he had that experience with
Jesus Christ ten years ago."
My
friend - "It is no secret what God can do."
Children,
obey your parents in the Lord, for this is right ... Fathers ... bring
(your children) up in the training and instruction of the Lord ...
Slaves,. obey your earthly masters ... just as your would obey Christ ...
and masters, treat your slaves in the same away .... since you know that
he who is both their Master and yours is in heaven ... .
AMAZING GRACE (Ephesians):
(14) Christian Warfare
(6:10 - 24)
As
we've been working our way through Ephesians in these last months we have
seen an idyllic world of "peaceful homes and healthful days".
Marriages that exist in the harmony of a God-directed order, children and
fathers working together for the good of the family, workers who are not
shirkers.
Suddenly,
verses 10 and 11 of chapter 6, we have a jarring note: "Finally ...
take your stand against the devil's schemes". It's what Martyn
Lloyd-Jones calls "a stirring call to battle ... Do you not hear the
bugle, and the trumpet?"
Some manuscripts are even stronger: "Henceforward", "From
this time on". It reinforces the idea that the time between the first
and second comings of Christ is a time of conflict.
One
would expect that the idea of conflict would particularly resonate with
us at the end of the Twentieth Century. Christians are called everywhere
to resist the trivialization of religious faith. That's the word Stephen
Carter, Cromwell Professor of Law at Yale, uses to describe the
marginalization of belief by the contemporary American religious
establishment. It's in a book titled The Culture of Disbelief that
President Clinton read on his holidays and this past Monday at a prayer
breakfast in Washington urged us all to read. Religion is a "mystical
irrationality", harmless, inoffensive. But never make it a basis
for public policy.
The
idea of spiritual warfare has been resisted by the modern American liberal
establishment that has dominated the mainline for half a century (or
more). I cannot begin to trace the thinking that led to an understanding
of the "principalities and powers" of verse 12 to be
"structural" rather than "personal" evil.
The emphasis on "peace-making" has contributed to this whole
attitude and faced with the horrors of nuclear warfare one has some
sympathy with the concern, though not with the one-sidedness of the
argument.
Other
well-meaning Christians have had the idea that we must eliminate all
thought of war-fare as negative and attempt to be "positive" in
our thinking. Some have adopted a passive view of the Christian faith such
as Watchman Nee in his book on Ephesians called Sit Walk Stand - we
sit with Christ in the heavenly places (2:6); we walk with
Christ (4:1, KJV) as live our faith - we stand on the ground Christ
has already won. Our battle, Nee tells us, is defensive not offensive.
There is little for us to do as Christians but "let go and let
God". That is quietism of the most destructive kind
which saps the strength against an enemy of the most devious and
corrupting vitality. It leads to naivete, withdrawal, neglect and
eventually defeat.
No!
Paul summons us at the end of Ephesians to spiritual warfare. But unlike
some Christians who are today fixated by the idea of conflict, he keeps it
in proportion, avoiding the twin dangers of complacency and alarmism, and
providing a perspective of realism about whom we are to fight and the
resources we have for the battle.
I. WHOM WE ARE TO FIGHT (vs 10 - 13)
It's
three centuries and a half since William Gurnall published his vast
treatise on these verses: The Christian in Complete Armour: A Treatise
of the Saint's War Against the Devil. The sub-title, in Puritan style,
says it all: "Wherein a discovery is made of that grand enemy of
God and his people - in his policies, power, seat of his empire,
wickedness and chief design he hath against the saints - a magazine opened
from whence the Christian is furnished with spiritual arms for the battle,
helped on with his armour, and taught the use of his weapon, together with
the happy issue of the whole war."
In
verse 12 we learn that it is not against "flesh and blood" that
we struggle, not against human beings, but rather with cosmic powers of
evil, the demonic. Paul goes on to tell us three things about the enemy we
face:
(1) The enemy is powerful - they
are the "spiritual forces ... in the heavenly realms", a term
taken from pagan astrology to describe the planets' control of human
destiny
(2) The enemy is evil - "the
powers of this dark world", "forces of evil", or as
Phillips paraphrases it "spiritual agents from the very headquarters
of evil".
(3) The enemy is cunning
- "the devil's schemes" or - more familiarly in the KJV
"the wiles of the devil". The devil both bullies and banters.
Some times he uses power, other times he employs tricks.
II. WHAT WE FIGHT WITH (vs 14 - 17)
So
we urged - four times in these verses - to stand: "Take
your stand ... out on the full armor .. so that .. you may be able
to stand ... and after you have done everything, to stand. Stand
therefore ...". Wobbly knees and faint hearts do not have any place
in the kingdom of God.
With
what then do we stand against the foe? You recall David fighting against
Goliath: "I come in the name of the Lord of hosts, the God of the
army of Israel whom you have defied."
We take the full armor of God (verse 14), the panoply of a
completely decked-out soldier which - according to verses 14 to 17 -
consist of six main pieces:
(a) the belt - a part of the undergarment - which held a soldier's
uniform together and meant he was unimpeded for battle. And for the
believer this is "truth", integrity, honesty.
(b) the breastplate of righteousness -
protection for the body which comes from the knowledge of our
"righteousness" or "justification", that we stand in
a relationship of confidence and openness before God
(c) feet fitted with the readiness that comes
from the gospel of peace - the 'half-boot' of the Roman soldier, with toes free
but with studded soles, tied to the ankles and shins. The gospel of peace
gives us a firm footing both as we look toward God and we face our fellow
humans.
(d) shield of faith
- as an indispensable necessity in our armory because only in this way can
we "extinguish all the flaming arrows of the evil one". What are
they? The accusations of the evil one, surely, which we defend by the
assurance of our faith as we defend ourselves by repeating the promises of
God
(e) the helmet of salvation
- which Paul has earlier stated
is "the hope of salvation" and which - to quote Charles
Hodge - is "that which adorns and protects the Christian, which
enables him (or her) to hold up his head with confidence and joy ... the
fact that he is saved."
(f) the sword of the Spirit
- those words of defence and witness that Jesus said would be given His
disciples by the Holy Spirit when they most needed them in their time of
trial, particularly words of Scripture which spring to our remembrance
when we are about to be bested by the foe.
So
much for the Christian's armor. What then of the outcome of the conflict?
What reassurance do we have of the final triumph?
III. WHY (AND HOW) WE WILL WIN (vs 18 - 24)
Two
remaining thoughts and a parting benediction conclude the letter we call
"Ephesians". In the fight to the finish Paul says we can be
confident of the outcome because we have two great resources we all share
in common:
(a) Prayer (vs 18 - 20)
He
uses four great comprehensives in verse 18 as he speaks of prayer: we are
to pray on all occasions, with all kinds of prayers and requests,
always keep on praying, for all the saints.
And
then he specifies his present need for prayer in verses 19 and 20. As
"an ambassador in chains" he needs prayer on his behalf. Prayer
for fearlessness - the word comes twice in the two verses, that words
would be given to him as he takes the sword of the Spirit.
(b) Community (vs 21 - 24)
The
other great assurance that we are on the winning side is the power of what
we share as we live in community: Tychicus is "a dear brother and
faithful servant" - he will give them the news and will do what he
has done for Paul, provide encouragement.
We
need that encouragement in the battle of faith. Yes, we have armor
protecting us, yes we have prayer to reassure us, but our strength is in
community: other parents who are struggling with raising their children in
a pagan culture; other seniors who are coping with illness, expenses,
neglect; other students in high school or college who are trying to say
"No" but find the pressures overwhelming at times; others who
are hemmed in by the forces of darkness and materialism and tempted to
make compromises as the years progress and they wonder if taking a stand
for Jesus is really worth it after all.
"Grace"
and "peace" - "charis" and "shalom", Jew and
Gentile bond and free. "Love with faith" and finally - a
reminder that we are in this Christian warfare to the finish - loving
Jesus must be "with an undying love".
So
the letter ends where it began: with grace.
Grace has been the keynot of the letterr. Grace, amazing, free and
sovereign. Grace that makes the heart sing. Or, as John MacKay stated it:
"What we read (in Ephesians) is truth that sings, doctrine set to
music. "
And
that will be the song we will sing in eternity:
"When
we've been there ten thousand years
Bright
shining as the sun,
We've
no less days to sing God's praise
Than
when we've first begun."
He
chose us in him ... to the praise of his glorious grace, which he has
freely givenb us in the One he loves.
Grace
to all who love our Lord Jesus Christ with an undying love.
Notes
[i]. Article 17, Articles of Faith.
[ii]. Cf John Stott's God's
New Society: The Message of Ephesians; Downer's Grove, IL (InterVarsity
Press), 1979; page 37.
[iii]. Number 402 in The Hymnbook,
written anonymously in 1880 and revised in The Pilgrim Hymnal,
1904.
[iv]. Bruce, F. F.; The Epistle to the Ephesians, A
Verse-by-verse Exposition; London (Pickering and Inglis), 1961; page
28.
[v]. Ephesians 5:1.
[vi]. A sister-in-law and a step-daughter disgracing him by
their sexual peccadilloes, and a brother-in-law entering a too-hasty
marriage following his divorce.
[vii]. Calvin, John; Sermons on The Epistle to the
Ephesians; London (Banner of Truth Trust), 1973; page 21.
[viii]. William Dyrness in How America Hears The Gospel;
Grand Rapids, MI (Wm. Eerdman's Pub. Co.), 1989; page 96.
[ix]. In his After Virtue.
[x]. Dyrness; Op. cit.; page 100.
[xi]. Idem.
[xii]. Person and Work of Christ, 1950 Ed., page 325.
[xiii]. Hendriksen, New Testament Commentary: Ephesians;
page 82.
[xiv]. Morris, Leon; The Apostolic Preaching of the Cross;
Grand Rapids, MI (Wm. B. Eerdmans), 1955; page 22.
[xv]. Matthew 20:28, Mark 10:45.
[xvi]. Lloyd-Jones, J. M.; God's Ultimate Purpose: An
Exposition of Ephesians 1:1
to 23; Grand Rapids, MI
(Baker Book House), 1979; pages 206 - 7.
[xvii]. Compare Ephesians 2:14 - 19.
[xviii]. Quoted in his God's Order; New York (Macmillan
Co.), 1953; page 8.
[xix]. Ibid.; pages 9 - 10.
[xxi]. Religion In America: Princeton Religion Research
Center, 1992-1993 25th Anniversary Edition; Princeton, NJ (The
Princeton Religion Research Center), 1993; page 6.
[xxii]. Idem.
[xxiii]. Ibid.; page 8.
[xxiv]. Phillips paraphrase of verse 16.
[xxv]. Knowing God; Downer's Grove, IL (InterVarsity
Press), 1973, pages 34 - 36.
[xxvi]. I John 3:2 and 3.
[xxvii]. New English Bible (1966) translation.
[xxviii]. St. Paul's Epistle to the Ephesians; London
(James Clark and Co. Ltd.), Second Edition; page 40.
[xxix]. I have taken the third of three possible translations,
cf John Stott's God's New Society: The Message of Ephesians for
the possible alternatives, pages 61 - 66.
[xxx]. Barth, Markus; Anchor Bible Commentary:Ephesians;
New York (Doubleday), 1974; vol. 1, page 208.
[xxxi]. Op. cit.;
page 8.
[xxxii]. Quoted by James Boice in his Ephesians: An
Expositional Commentary; Grand Rapids, MI (Zondervan), 1988; pages
72-3. Originally in Ironside's In the Heavenlies; pages 96-8.
[xxxiii]. Handley Carr Glyn Moule in his Ephesian Studies;
London (Hodder and Stoughton), 1902; page 78.
[xxxiv]. Hence John Stott, God's New Society, page 71.
[xxxv]. Stott; Op. cit.; page 74.
[xxxvi]. Idem.
[xxxvii]. James Montgomery Boice; Ephesians: An Expositional
Commentary; pages 57-8.
[xxxviii]. How God Saves Men; Philadelphia, PA (The Bible
Study Hour, 1955), pages 7 - 9; quoted by James Boice in Op. cit.,
pages 62-3.
[xxxix]. Lloyd-Jones; Op. cit.; page 60.
[xli]. Cf Trillium's comment: "After I visited Yale in
1970, I was trying to explain to a classmate how the place had changed,
and he said, 'What's their word of
weenie?' That was the point, I told him: they were so tolerant that they
didn't have w word of weenie. He mulled that over for a few moments. 'In
that case,' he finally said, they're all weenies.'" (Remembering
Denny; New York, NY (Farrar, Straus, Giroux), 1993; page 64.
[xlii]. In God's Way of Reconciliation; Grand Rapids, MI
(Baker Book House); pages 224-5.
[xliii]. God's New Society: The Message of Ephesians;
page 102.
[xliv]. John 20:19 - 21.
[xlv]. Colquhoun, Frank; Hymns That Live; Downer's
Grove, IL (InterVarsity Press), 1980; page 104.
[xlvi]. Cited by Boice; Op. cit.; page 102.
[xlvii]. As in Stott; Op. cit.; pages 139-140.
[xlviii]. No Place For Truth; Grand Rapids, MI (Wm.
Eerdmanns), 1993; page 108.
[xlix]. The Princeton Seminary Bulletin; vol. xiv, no.
1; New Series 1993; page 62.
[l]. Lloyd-Jones, D. Martyn; Christian Unity: An
Exposition of Ephesians 4:1 to 16; Grand Rapids, MI Bake Book
House), 1981; page 24.
[li]. John 17:22.
[lii]. I Corinthians 12:13.
[liii]. See Boice's explanation of the textual problem in his Ephesians:
An Expositional Commentary; Grand Rapids, MI (Zondervan); page 121;
also Stott; Op. cit.; page 157.
[liv]. Quoted in his Furnace of Renewal; Downer's
Grove, IL (InterVarsity Press), 1981; page 81.
[lv]. Stott; Op. cit.; page 164.
[lvi]. Mark 10:45.
[lvii]. Your Confirmation, page 2.
[lviii]. I Peter 2:2.
[lix]. "Father, I know that all my life" by Anna L.
Waring (1820 - 1910).
[lx]. God's New Society: The Message of Ephesians in The
Bible Speaks Today series; Downer's Grove, IL (InterVarsity Press),
1979; pages 177 -8.
[lxi]. Boice, Op. cit., page 148 who is turn is quoted
Barclay, page 183.
[lxii]. Stott; Op. cit.; page 196.
[lxiii]. Augustine; Confessions, Book Eight, VII, second
paragraph (F. J. Sheed, trans.), page 139.
[lxiv]. Idem; Book Eight, XII, paragraph 2 (page 146).
[lxv]. As quoted in First Things (June-July, 1993),
page 9.
[lxvi]. Evans, Mary J.; Women In The Bible; Downer's
Grove, IL (InterVarsity Press), 1983,
page 40.
[lxvii]. Idem. Quoting D. S. Bailey; The Man-Woman
Relation in Christian Thought, page 4.
[lxviii]. What's Right With Feminism; Grand Rapids, MI
(Wm. Eerdman's), 1985; pages 169-170.
[lxix].
Ibid, page 170.
[lxx]. "Christians As Citizens, Employees, and
Spouses", #9024, from the series Hope For Today (I Peter);
page 3.
[lxxi]. Vide Elaine Storkey's comments in Op. cit., page
170.
[lxxii]. Hebrews 13:4.
[lxxii]. Mark 10:45.
[lxxii]. Quoted in Miriam Adeney's A Time For Risking:
Priorities For Women; Portland, OR (Multnomah Press), 1987; page
136; from Eerdman's Book of Famous Prayers, p. 68.
[lxxii]. Bainton, Roland H.; Here I Stand; New York
(Abingdon), 1950; page 290.
[lxxii]. Ibid., page 295.
[lxxii]. Quoted by William Barclay in The Letters to the
Galatians and Ephesians; Edinburgh (St. Andrew's Press), 1954; page
209.
[lxxii]. Quoting again from Barclay, Ibid., page 208.
[lxxii]. II Timothy 3:1-2.
[lxxii]. This has caused no end of controversy for the Second
has a promise attached when it speaks of God "showing love to thousands".
"First here can either mean first in priority, or the mark of the
Second can be simply a characteristic of God and the Fifth containing a
promise like none of the others. Bruce adds in his commentary that Paul
is thinking "not only of the decalogue but of the whole body of
Pentateuchal legislation which is introduced by the decalogue."
(Page 121) See Stott's treatment in Op. cit., pages 240-1.
[lxxii]. In his commentary, Op. cit., ad loc.,
(page 243.
[lxxii]. In his Life in the Spirit in Marriage, Home &
Work: An Exposition of Ephesians 5:18 - 6:9; Grand Rapids, MI
(Baker Book House), 1973; page 279.
[lxxii]. John Stott (page 251) quoting Salmon; History of the
Roman World from 30 BC to AD 138; London (Methuen), 1944; page 72.
[lxxii]. In his The Christian Warfare: An Exposition of
Ephesians 6:10 - 13; Grand Rapids, MI (Baker Book House), 1976;
pages 16, 22.
[lxxii]. It began in 1952 with a book by Gordon Rupp entitled Principalities
and Powers, continued with G. B. Caird's book of the same title in
1954 and was advanced by Markus (son of Karl) Barth in a 1959 title and
subsequently in his two volume commentary in the Anchor Bible
series (1974). A good, short, critique of this position is found in God's
New Society by John Stott, pages 267 - 272. This view was adopted in
the 1970's by leading evangelical pacifists such as John Howard Yoder
and Samuel Escobar in their discussion of "structural evil".
[lxxii]. I Samuel 17:45.
[lxxii]. I Thessalonians 5:8.
[lxxii]. Hodge, Charles; A Commentaryon the Epistle to the
Ephesians; Grand Rapids, MI (Eerdman's), 1954; ad loc.
[lxxii]. MacKay; Op. cit.; page 33.
[lxxii]. Verse 4 of "Amazing Grace".